Of Fusion and Funding

by | Dec 14, 2005 | Advanced Rocketry

First noted in Star Spangled Cosmos, this article from the Palm Beach Post about fusion research, focusing on recent progress and discussing the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) consortium. The latter group plans to build an experimental fusion reactor in France by 2016. Speaking to Stephen Paul, a senior research physicist at Princeton University’s plasma laboratory, writer Ron Wiggins notes that fusion reactions have been sustained in laboratory settings for up to 24 seconds. How do we fund the next steps toward viability?

From the story:

The problem is that plasma — the primordial gas resulting when hydrogen atoms are heated to 100 million degrees — is difficult to contain in small reactors.

The bigger the reactor, the easier it is to control the reaction. Big reactors are expensive.

“Our reactor at Princeton is small — a man could walk into it. England has the biggest facility — about two stories.”

ITER would create such a reactor, a five-story experimental unit built to the tune of $5.5 billion, with the US paying up to $200 million per year once construction begins in 2006. Costs would be shared between the U.S., Japan, Russia, England and the European Union. Wiggins goes on to note that U.S. research is in a squeeze, with domestic research on fusion being cut to pay for ITER commitments. Paul told Wiggins that learning to manage plasma in small spaces should keep U.S. labs in the thick of the fusion hunt, and make them more rational repositories of funding than ITER, if the budget gets so tight that it comes down to a choice between the two.

Centauri Dreams‘ take: Getting practical fusion to work in a propulsion system is going to demand radical reductions in scale, just the sort of thing laboratories like Princeton are engaged in studying, though with more earthly considerations in mind. Even so, the annual U.S. budget for fusion research is less than $200 million per year. It seems reasonable to direct that funding toward the kind of containment systems that will make fusion practicable both for power production and, ultimately, advanced propulsion systems that could open up the outer planets.

0 Comments

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. The Star Spangled Cosmos - t get into alternative confinement schemes, but he does argue that improving plasma confinement in current reactors may do more…

Now Reading

Charter

In Centauri Dreams, Paul Gilster looks at peer-reviewed research on deep space exploration, with an eye toward interstellar possibilities. For many years this site coordinated its efforts with the Tau Zero Foundation. It now serves as an independent forum for deep space news and ideas. In the logo above, the leftmost star is Alpha Centauri, a triple system closer than any other star, and a primary target for early interstellar probes. To its right is Beta Centauri (not a part of the Alpha Centauri system), with Beta, Gamma, Delta and Epsilon Crucis, stars in the Southern Cross, visible at the far right (image courtesy of Marco Lorenzi).

Recent Posts

On Comments

If you'd like to submit a comment for possible publication on Centauri Dreams, I will be glad to consider it. The primary criterion is that comments contribute meaningfully to the debate. Among other criteria for selection: Comments must be on topic, directly related to the post in question, must use appropriate language, and must not be abusive to others. Civility counts. In addition, a valid email address is required for a comment to be considered. Centauri Dreams is emphatically not a soapbox for political or religious views submitted by individuals or organizations. Human comments only, please -- cut and paste from AI will not be acceptable. A long form of the policy can be viewed on the Administrative page. The short form is this: If your comment is not on topic and respectful to others, I'm probably not going to run it.


Advanced Propulsion Research

Beginning and End

Archives