Cometary Clues to Solar System Origins

by Paul Gilster on November 5, 2009

The Earth receives thousands of tons of interplanetary dust every year as it makes its way around the Sun. Can we trace any of this material to a particular source? Scientists from the Carnegie Institution think the answer is yes, at least in the case of comet Grigg-Skjellerup. The Carnegie team worked with interplanetary dust particles (IDPs) collected by a NASA aircraft in 2003, just after the Earth had passed through the comet’s tail, focusing on the chemical, isotopic and micro-structural composition of the grains.

Collecting Comet Dust

A bit of background: NASA’s Scott Messenger (JSC-Houston) predicted that Grigg-Skjellerup dust grains could be captured in the stratosphere at a specific time of the year (the comet reappears every five years). The dust collection flights that followed his prediction involved an ER-2 high-altitude aircraft flown out of Dryden Flight Research Center in 2003. Out of this work came the new mineral now called Brownleeite, a manganese silicide found in one of the particles. NASA routinely collects IDPs in such flights.

comet_grigg-skjellerup

In the Carnegie IDP study, a particular signature seems to stand out. “What we found is that they are very different from typical IDPs,” says Carnegie’s Larry Nittler. “They are more primitive, with higher abundances of material whose origin predates the formation of the solar system.” That again points the finger at comet Grigg-Skjellerup, and it also offers the opportunity to study comet particles in the lab from more than a single comet. Recall that the Stardust mission brought back particles from comet 81P/Wild 2 in 2006.

Image: Comet Grigg-Skjellerup offers up material that is more than 4.5 billion years old. Credit: iStockphoto.

This is helpful stuff because comets are believed to incorporate matter from the Solar System’s formative era. We would expect such material to have escaped the heating and chemical processing that would have affected the planets, but interestingly enough, the Wild 2 dust included a great deal of altered material, as this news release points out. Grigg-Skjellerup’s dust tells us that all comets are not the same in terms of composition, giving us the chance, as Nittler says, to “…use them as tracers for different processes that occurred in the solar system four-and-a-half billion years ago.”

Cometary Differences and Similarities

We can also weigh the Grigg-Skjellerup material against the findings of the Deep Impact experiment on comet 9P/Tempel 1. From the abstract of the paper on this work:

Our study together with observations of comet 9P/Tempel 1 during the Deep Impact experiment and 81P/Wild 2 dust analyses reveal some compositional variations and many similarities among three Jupiter-family comets. Specifically carbonates and primitive organic matter or amorphous carbon were widespread in the comet-forming regions of the outer protoplanetary disk and not all comets contain as much inner solar system material as has been inferred for comet 81P/Wild 2.

Presolar grains — dust particles formed in previous star generations and in supernovae before the birth of the Solar System — provided the biggest surprise. They can be identified by their unusual isotopic compositions, but they’re normally quite rare. Yet in the dust particles associated with Grigg-Skjellerup they are tens of times more plentiful than in other primitive materials.

The paper is Busemann et al., “Ultra-primitive interplanetary dust particles from the comet 26P/Grigg–Skjellerup dust stream collection,” Earth and Planetary Science Letters, published online 8 October 2009 (abstract).

tzf_img_post

Bookmark and Share

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }

MG Ellington November 5, 2009 at 11:29

“This is helpful stuff because comets are believed to incorporate matter from the Solar System’s formative era.” Does this mean that we expect they are older in many cases than our planets or of the same age? Do scientists expect that the material in these comets is a sampling of what is in many of the planets and/or their moons?

Adam November 5, 2009 at 15:53

Hi MG Ellington

Comets preserve material that hasn’t been changed via the magmatism on and under the surface of larger bodies, like the planets and dwarf planets, which has effectively erased that very early history of the solar system from them. This isn’t to say that comets haven’t had a history of their own, but whatever formative heating they’ve experienced was minor compared to the large-scale lava/magma creation of the larger objects.

Carl November 5, 2009 at 17:05

Hello, MG,

“The objects that did not accrete to form large enough bodies to differentiate retain the chemical composition of the original condensed solar nebula. Thus we believe the oldest meteorites (and comets, should we ever get to sample them) hold clues about the early phases of solar system evolution.” From http://lasp.colorado.edu/~bagenal/1010/SESSIONS/11.Formation.html ‘A Scenario for the Origin and Evolution of the Solar System’.

The other thing that comets offer is fuel for fusion-powered craft: “Using deuterium as the rocket fuel of choice, abundantly available on the comets of the Oort cloud, rockets driven by deuterium fusion, can there be refueled.” http://arxiv.org/abs/0906.0740 which is a link from the Centauri Dreams October 26 article, “Refining the Deuterium Starship”, by Adam Crowl. By the time actual fusion starships might be built, astronomy could be able to verify cometary clouds around destination stars, potentially enabling them to visit several star systems.

kurt9 November 6, 2009 at 17:30

I’ve a question for you guys.

I believe that cyano-bacteria is the most simple form of life that generates Oxygen as a by-product of photosynthesis. It is also the only such life form that is not a Eukaryote. My question is this: was the Cyano-bacteria that existed on the early Earth sufficient to create a Oxygen atmosphere that is breathable by modern life, or was the emergence of Eukaryote photosynthetic life necessary to create this atmosphere?

I think this issue is relevant to the commonality of habitable planets in the galaxy.

ROCA November 7, 2009 at 16:26
Administrator November 7, 2009 at 19:21

Thanks, ROCA. It’s now fixed.

Leave a Comment

All comments are moderated. Only those comments that are directly related to the post in question, use appropriate language and are not abusive to others will be posted. A valid email address is required for a comment to be considered. We do not publish promotional materials from companies or individuals.

{ 2 trackbacks }