≡ Menu

Reconfigurable Structures in Space: Q & A

Cornell aerospace engineer Mason Peck captured the attention of Centauri Dreams readers recently when Larry Klaes wrote up his ideas on modular spacecraft and self-assembly. Peck has talked about using the technology, which draws on a property of superconductors called magnetic flux pinning, to assemble or reconfigure structures in space without mechanical hardware. These are provocative concepts, and Dr. Peck has been kind enough to provide answers to questions from reader Christopher Bennett, beginning with whether or not his notions bear any resemblance to an idea long familiar in science fiction, the manipulation of objects by force fields. Here’s what Bennett wondered about reconfigurable structures in space:

“It sounds like what’s being talked about here is something surprisingly similar to the old SF idea of building with forcefields. Do I understand this right?” Are we talking about creating clusters of unconnected components that are held rigidly in place by magnetic fields even without touching each other? I don’t quite see how that works — I can get a field causing a continuous pull or push, but I don’t get how that pull suddenly stops pulling and holds an object at a fixed distance.”

And here is Dr. Peck’s response:

[On the issue of force fields,] the applications are similar. In this case, an object with a magnetic field, like a permanent magnet, experiences a force when it’s placed in proximity to the Type II superconductor. What makes the effect really valuable is that the object might feel no force in some particular position and orientation, but when it moves, the superconductor forces it back into place. In that sense, flux pinning acts like a six degree-of-freedom spring (three translations and three rotations) that keeps the object hovering in space.

What happens is that the superconductor dislikes changes in the state of little electrical currents that eddy around inside it. That’s why superconductors conduct electricity perfectly: the current isn’t allowed to change as it passes through. When the magnet moves, it tries to induce a current in the superconductor. The superconductor puts up a fight, resisting that change. If the magnet pushes back hard enough, the superconductor relents and soaks up some current. There’s mechanical work done, and energy transferred in that process. Small displacements of the magnet from its flux-pinned equilibrium result in a little vibration of the magnet, and then the magnet typically returns to equilibrium. Large displacements cause a sort of hysteresis behavior, where the magnet can establish a new equilibrium position. Changing the position can result in so much energy exchange that the motion becomes heavily damped–i.e., vibrations calm down quickly. All this is very useful in building structures in space.

Action at a distance inspires lots of science-fiction ideas. I suppose the reason is that electromagnetism, gravity, and inter-nuclear forces seem somewhat beyond our ability to appreciate on an instinctive level. They don’t conform to our daily experience, in which matter has to touch in order to exchange momentum, i.e. interact via forces. In the case of flux pinning, the superconductor acts like a very high-bandwidth active control system, continually tweaking its internal magnetic field to maintain this stable relative equilibrium. That’s necessary because without this sort of feedback, a theoretical result known as Earnshaw’s theorem proves that no constant electromagnetic forces can produce the kind of equilibrium we achieve with flux pinning. For example, Earnshaw prevents you from being able to devise that 3D hovering magnetic setup you’ve been thinking about. The magnets will collapse onto one another or spring apart unless at least one degree of freedom is constrained somehow. It’s also the basis for your insightful comment that you can “get a field causing a continuous pull or push.”

I’ve never really understood how a force field is supposed to work. I suspect it’s a misnomer. We understand what a “potential field” is, and we know that force equals the negative of the potential’s gradient (or local rate of change). But no physics I’m aware of allows force to hang out in the middle of nowhere, waiting for someone to walk into it and receive an unpleasant surprise. I suppose if one could devise a way to collect force-carrying particles (like gravitons) and cause them to hover in place, such an effect might arise; but that’s completely speculative on my part. You would be better off asking a particle physicist how he might accomplish such a thing. Flux pinning might seem magical, but as Clarke says, any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Flux pinning isn’t even that advanced. It’s a well-known property, but our research group may be the first to consider applying it as a technology for building structures in space.

If you want to build, say, a Star Trek style door that confines people to the brig, you’ll have to look further. Flux pinning works only on magnetic materials. Sure, there’s a little magnetic material in your body, but it’s not enough. In fact, your body is also weakly diamagnetic (see http://www.hfml.ru.nl/froglev.html). Unless you can strongly magnetize a prisoner, he’s unlikely to stay put merely with flux pinning.

And how rigid a connection are we talking about?

For a few ounces of magnet and superconductor material, one can achieve about 400 N/m stiffness. More material adds stiffness. If you try demonstrating the effect yourself, you’ll discover that it’s quite difficult to press a magnet about 1” in diameter close enough to a superconductor to make them touch. It requires some surprising strength.

If one component of, say, a multi-piece spaceship were under thrust, would the other components travel with it and stay in the same orientation? Could astronauts push off from one module to the next and have them stay in place? Could you have something like, say, the starship Enterprise without the connecting pylons?

Depends on the thrust. Anything we’re likely to see in the next few decades in space will not experience acceleration above 1g. Most forces in space cause micro-g accelerations. We know that flux pinning can levitate and suspend objects in gravity (1g). So, flux-pinning forces are likely sufficient in the near term in a variety of applications. I don’t know what accelerations the structure of the Enterprise experiences during warp drive. No-one inside seems to feel it. So, I suppose it’s possible.

And is this something that would require power to maintain, like a fictional forcefield, or would it be intrinsic to the materials?

That’s the best part. The connection requires no power to maintain the equilibrium. All that is necessary is for the superconductor to remain cold. And space is pretty cold already. Our favorite material, YBCO [yttrium barium copper oxide], needs to stay colder than 88K. Even colder is better. That’s above the temperature of liquid nitrogen and well above temperatures that can be achieved on spacecraft that use “sun shields” to keep things cool. Beyond the asteroid belt, roughly, a bare superconductor in space would stay cold enough without any other means of keeping it cold. So, a permanent magnet and a superconductor would remain in a flux-pinned equilibrium for a long time. In our lab, we can keep the superconductors cold for about 15 minutes with a thin layer of foam around them–and that’s in a room-temperature environment with convection (heating by wind). Doing the same thing in space ought to be easier.

Needless to say, Centauri Dreams thanks Dr. Peck for taking the time to fill us in on these concepts, which suggest new methods for accomplishing a wide range of potential missions. We’ll keep a sharp eye on future developments growing out of this work.

Comments on this entry are closed.

  • Ron S February 1, 2008, 18:04

    If I understand this correctly, effectively the energy to maintain position (which generates current in the superconductor) is taken from the environment. That is, taken from whatever caused the components to drift apart – astronauts moving around, gravitational tides, etc.

    One thing that occurs to me is that an assembly like this in orbit might take to tumbling if left uncorrected since the components would be in different orbits with different orbital periods and/or trajectories. Probably not a serious problem to correct, either with gyros or periodic realignment of the system with respect to the planet.

  • James M. Essig February 3, 2008, 0:55

    Hi Ron S;

    This is a real neat application of electrodynamic field effects that we understand well. It makes me wonder how many more electrodynamic/electromagnetic physics concepts are just around the corner due to developments in materials science. One that I am particularly interested in is the development of metamaterials that have a negative index of refraction such as those being developed at Duke Univsersity and the U.S. governemt. These materials would actually have the peculiar property that they would be pulled in the direction of an impinging light beam instead of being pushed by it for frequencies of EM radiation for which the material was active. Also, the light of reflection from these metamaterials would be blue shifted as the object receeds instead of red dopplar shifted at least for non-relativistic velocities. Electro-optical, optical, and electrical conducting materials research shoud get very interesting in the comming decades. I am looking forward to what the material scientists and solid state physics folks come up with.

    Thanks;

    Jim

  • Christopher L. Bennett February 4, 2008, 16:23

    I want to thank Dr. Peck for taking the time to answer my questions. As an SF author, I’m very interested in exploring the potential applications of things like this, and it’s good to get more details.

    The flux pinning effect is intriguing, and the description of how a conductor would librate back to equilibrium reminds me of an L4 or L5 point, although I suppose the mechanism is different.

    Dr. Peck says: “Large displacements cause a sort of hysteresis behavior, where the magnet can establish a new equilibrium position.”

    It sounds like a controlled application of that effect could be used to reconfigure an array like this. If the components have thrusters of some sort, they could move themselves to a new position and then settle in there. So you have a stable but adjustable system.

    My starship-Enterprise analogy wasn’t meant to refer to the kind of propulsion it uses, but just the idea of a modular, multi-piece spacecraft. I’ve seen plenty of (non-fictional) design proposals for spaceships with modules connected by lightweight struts and lattices and pylons, and I’m wondering if an even more lightweight ship could be built using flux pinning to hold the modules together.

    The required cold temperature is a problem, though; an inhabited module would have to have a pretty good way of shunting its heat off to radiators so that the superconductive portions would remain frosty. Or else a higher-temperature superconductor would have to be invented.

    Another possibility that occurs to me is a kind of shielding, in a space-combat scenario. A ship or space station could perhaps surround itself with a flux-pinned cloud of small particles to intercept incoming projectiles, with the intervening vacuum protecting the ship/station from the heat and kinetic energy of impact. Maybe this could also help against micrometeoroids, but I’d imagine keeping such a cloud up permanently would be impractical for a station or habitat that needs ships to dock with it. Although maybe the field could be adjusted to create clear paths for incoming ships.

  • James M. Essig February 17, 2008, 17:51

    Hi Christopher;

    I like your idea of flux-pinned clouds of small particles. The flux pinned particles could have a fairly broad range of sizes some of which would be more effective at smashing and ionizing larger, although still very small, debris. The particle distribution by size could be arranged in a layered like armoured arrangement where different layers of the cloud would have different size ranges of flux linked particles. This kind of reminds me of the way U.S. nuclear powered aircraft carriers are built wherein they essentially have a hull located within a hull which some sources say is repeated seven times with spaces between hulls wherein the first hull would dissipate some of the energy of an incomming round or ordinance wherein the debris would diverge before striking the second outermost hull and the process would repeat itself hopefully before the kinetic energy of blast wave debris breaches the inner most hull thus possibly injuring or killing crew members and at worst case leading to the sinking of the ship.

    I must say, I have never heard of such a concept as flux linked protective particles for protecting space craft but if it can be done, I think it would be a great idea.

    Thanks;

    Your Friend Jim

  • ljk April 25, 2008, 9:55

    NASA gets small with tiny satellite program

    Network World April 24, 2008

    NASA’s Ames Research Center said
    Thursday it would team with m2mi to
    develop “nanosats” that weigh
    between 11 and 110 pounds. The
    agency says large groups of
    nanosatellites can be grouped in a
    constellation, which will be placed
    in low-Earth-orbit to offer new
    “fifth generation”
    telecommunications and TCP/IP-based
    networks and related…

    http://www.kurzweilai.net/email/newsRedirect.html?newsID=8532&m=25748

  • ljk April 11, 2009, 8:48

    April 10, 2009

    Progress Toward Reconfigurable Spacecraft Via Magnetic Flux Pinning

    There is progress working in the lab and in theory how to create reconfigurable spacecraft. The dynamics and control problems have been worked on in theory, math and simulation and the joints have been mocked and tested on an air table.

    Success would transform space operations and systems and enable large particle based solar sails, large optical telescope arrays and large lens for focusing lasers and networks of satellites and flexible modules for space stations. Shoer and Peck and others at their lab are doing great work in this area.

    Magnetic reconfiguration would allow for unique structures in space. An example is below. The speed and flexibility of the reconfiguration is especially powerful if the magnetic joints and components are more compact.

    http://nextbigfuture.com/2009/04/progres-toward-reconfigurable.html