Into the ‘Brown Dwarf Desert’

by | Nov 11, 2016 | Deep Sky Astronomy & Telescopes | 1 comment

A newly discovered brown dwarf dubbed OGLE-2015-BLG-1319 is significant on several fronts, not the least of which is how it was found. Not only are we dealing here with another instance of gravitational microlensing, where the light of a background star is affected by a foreground object in ways that give us information about the closer star, but this instance of microlensing saw two space telescopes working together to make sense of the event, the first time a microlensing event has been observed by two space telescopes and from the ground.

The space-based instruments in question are the Spitzer and Swift telescopes, whose combined observations give us different magnification patterns rising from the same event. Spitzer observed the binary system containing the brown dwarf in July of 2015 from its perch about 1 AU away from the Earth. Swift, in low Earth orbit, also saw the system in late June of that year, marking its first microlensing observation. The first notification of the event came from the Optical Gravitational Lens Experiment (OGLE) in Chile, and it was also observed by the Microlensing Observations in Astrophysics (MOA) collaboration in New Zealand.

pia21076_fig1

Image: This illustration depicts a newly discovered brown dwarf, an object that weighs in somewhere between our solar system’s most massive planet (Jupiter) and the least-massive-known star. This brown dwarf was discovered when it and its star passed between Earth and a much more distant star in our galaxy. This created a microlensing event, where the gravity of the system amplified the light of the background star over the course of several weeks. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech.

Combining the data and including observations from ground-based instruments allows scientists to make a call on the mass of the brown dwarf, between 30 and 65 Jupiter masses. The brown dwarf orbits a K-class star with about half the mass of the Sun. But focus on this: One of two possible distances between brown dwarf and star is 0.25 AU, which would put the object in what is known as the brown dwarf desert. The latter is a reference to the fact that stars of about the Sun’s mass rarely have a brown dwarf orbiting within 3-5 AU.

We don’t know for sure because there are two solutions to the distance question, the second being 40-52 AU. The paper notes that the Swift satellite is not distant enough from the Earth to allow for a separate measurement of the microlensing parallax, which would have made it possible to refine the distance measurement further. We get two solutions for the projected separation of brown dwarf and star, a well-known problem called close-wide degeneracy in which the perturbation patterns of close and wide objects can appear similar.

But if the 0.25 AU distance is correct, it would add to mounting evidence that the so-called ‘desert’ may be a mirage. For it turns out that OGLE-2015-BLG-1319 is hardly the first brown dwarf found through microlensing. In fact, there have been 15 published microlensing events involving brown dwarfs before this one, including one that hosted a planet, ten brown dwarfs around main sequence stars (with nine around M-dwarfs and one around a G-K class star), two binary brown dwarfs and two isolated brown dwarfs. In about half of these we also have questions about the distance between brown dwarf and star, but note this from the paper:

…the accumulation of detections suggests that BDs around main-sequence stars are not rare at separations of 0.5-20 AU, where microlensing is sensitive (this range is larger than for exoplanets due to higher detection sensitivity). This is in contrast to estimates through other techniques, such as radial velocity and transit, who find that BDs are rare (< 1%, Grether & Lineweaver 2006) at closer separations.

What to make of this? The paper continues:

One possible explanation for this difference, as suggested by Shvartzvald et al. (2016), is the different host stars that are mostly probed by each technique — FGK stars by radial velocity and transits versus M stars by microlensing.

Or as lead author Yossi Shvartzvald (JPL) puts it in this JPL news release:

“We want to understand how brown dwarfs form around stars, and why there is a gap in where they are found relative to their host stars. It’s possible that the ‘desert’ is not as dry as we think.”

The paper is Shvartzvald et al., “First simultaneous microlensing observations by two space telescopes: Spitzer & Swift reveal a brown dwarf in event OGLE-2015-BLG-1319,” Astrophysical Journal Vol. 831, No. 2 (7 November 2016). Abstract / preprint.

tzf_img_post

1 Comment

  1. If the correct distance IS 0.25 AU, and the star is a MAIN SEQUENCE star, it would also put it in the star’s habitable zone, the FIRST brown dwarf in such a low-mass main sequence star’s habitable zone. Any planets orbiting the brown dwarf could POTENTIALLY host life. Breakthrough Listen ought to take an interest!

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. OGLE-2015-BLG-1319: uma anã marrom dentro do “Deserto de Anãs Marrons”? » O Universo - Eternos Aprendizes - […] Centauri Dreams: Into the ‘Brown Dwarf Desert’ […]
  2. El desierto de las enanas marrones | Astrobitácora - […] Referencias: Centauri Dreams […]

Now Reading

Charter

In Centauri Dreams, Paul Gilster looks at peer-reviewed research on deep space exploration, with an eye toward interstellar possibilities. For many years this site coordinated its efforts with the Tau Zero Foundation. It now serves as an independent forum for deep space news and ideas. In the logo above, the leftmost star is Alpha Centauri, a triple system closer than any other star, and a primary target for early interstellar probes. To its right is Beta Centauri (not a part of the Alpha Centauri system), with Beta, Gamma, Delta and Epsilon Crucis, stars in the Southern Cross, visible at the far right (image courtesy of Marco Lorenzi).

Recent Posts

On Comments

If you'd like to submit a comment for possible publication on Centauri Dreams, I will be glad to consider it. The primary criterion is that comments contribute meaningfully to the debate. Among other criteria for selection: Comments must be on topic, directly related to the post in question, must use appropriate language, and must not be abusive to others. Civility counts. In addition, a valid email address is required for a comment to be considered. Centauri Dreams is emphatically not a soapbox for political or religious views submitted by individuals or organizations. Human comments only, please -- cut and paste from AI will not be acceptable. A long form of the policy can be viewed on the Administrative page. The short form is this: If your comment is not on topic and respectful to others, I'm probably not going to run it.


Advanced Propulsion Research

Beginning and End

Archives