≡ Menu

FRB 121102: New Bursts From Older Data

“Not all discoveries come from new observations,” says Pete Worden, in a comment referring to original thinking as applied to an existing dataset. Worden is executive director of the Breakthrough Initiatives program, which includes Breakthrough Listen, an ambitious attempt to use SETI techniques to search for signs of technological activity in the universe. Note that last word: The targets Breakthrough Listen examines do extend to about one million stars in the stellar neighborhood, but they also go well outside the Milky Way, with 100 galaxies being studied in a range of radio and optical bands.

A major and sometimes neglected aspect of SETI as it is reported in the media is the fact that such careful observation can turn up highly useful astronomical information unrelated to any extraterrestrial technologies. Worden’s comment underlines the fact that we are generating vast data archives as our multiplying space- and ground-based instruments continue to scan the heavens at various wavelengths. It is not inconceivable that the signature of a distant civilization or a novel astrophysical process is buried deep within data that is years or decades old.

The case in point this morning comes through Breakthrough Listen’s observations of the Fast Radio Burst (FRB) 121102. FRBs seize the attention because they are a recent and puzzling detection. The first, the so-called Lorimer Burst (FRB 010724) was found no more than eleven years ago. FRBs are also highly unusual, appearing as radio pulses of extremely short duration, usually milliseconds. They are believed to originate in distant galaxies and one of them, FRB 121102, stands out because unlike all others thus far detected, it sends out repeat bursts.

Image: The FRB in question. This is a Gemini composite image of the field around FRB 121102 (indicated). The dwarf host galaxy was imaged, and spectroscopy performed, using the Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph (GMOS) on the Gemini North telescope on Maunakea in Hawai’i. Data were obtained on October 24-25 and November 2, 2016, before the subsequent Breakthrough Listen observations at Green Bank. Credit: Gemini Observatory/AURA/NSF/NRC.

FRB 121102 is prolific in repeat bursts, as it turns out, and this is where Worden’s words resonate. Earlier studies have shown that the source is located in a galaxy some 3 billion light years away. Breakthrough Listen’s observing team at the University of California, Berkeley SETI Research Center went to work on this ‘repeater’ on August 26, 2017, finding a total of 21 bursts in data acquired at the Green Bank Telescope in West Virginia. All of these turned up within a single hour, which implies periods of intense activity. For more, see New Activity of Repeating FRB 121102.

Working with the same dataset, UC Berkeley graduate student Gerry Zhang and collaborators have now introduced a new machine learning algorithm into the mix, subjecting the same dataset (about 400 TB) to techniques not dissimilar to those used by Internet technology companies. Zhang and team’s ‘convolutional neural network’ was trained to recognize FRBs in the same way that Vishal Gajjar applied when he and his own colleagues analyzed the data in 2017. The algorithm was then applied to the raw data to see if anything new could be acquired.

From the paper:

…we present a re-analysis of the C-band observation by Breakthrough Listen on August 26, 2017 with convolutional neural networks. Recent rapid development of deep learning, and in particular, convolutional neural networks (CNN; Krizhevsky et al. 2012; Simonyan & Zisserman 2014; He et al. 2015; Szegedy et al. 2014) has enabled revolutionary improvements to signal classification, pattern recognition in all fields of data science such as, but not limited to computer image processing, medicine, and autonomous driving. In this work, we present the first successful application of deep learning to direct detection of fast radio transient signals in raw spectrogram data.

The result: 72 new detections of pulses from FRB 121102. That takes the cumulative total from this dataset to 93 pulses in five hours of observation, including 45 pulses within the first 30 minutes. As to periodicity, the work shows that the pulses are not received in a regular pattern. Using the same methods, Zhang and team go on to explore trends in pulse fluence, pulse detection rate, and pulse frequency structure. The breadth of the analysis is made possible by the sheer number of pulses, the highest detected from a single observation, and the use of Zhang and team’s neural network technology, which can surely be adapted to other datasets.

“Gerry’s work is exciting not just because it helps us understand the dynamic behavior of FRBs in more detail,” says Berkeley SETI Research Center Director and Breakthrough Listen Principal Investigator Dr. Andrew Siemion, “but also because of the promise it shows for using machine learning to detect signals missed by classical algorithms.”

So can we be sure we are dealing with a natural astrophysical phenomenon, or is there any possibility of a technology behind this repeating FRB? The data here do not give us the answer, but it’s intriguing to speculate about galactic SETI in light of our recent discussion of the work of Yuki Nishino and Naoki Seto (Kyoto University), who have suggested that natural phenomena such as the merger of a binary neutron star system like GW170817 could be used as a marker to flag a message from a civilization attempting to announce its presence to the cosmos.

For that matter, are all FRBs the same? We’ve only found the one repeater thus far, but 104 are now thought to occur in our sky on a daily basis. Avi Loeb and Minasvi Lingam (Harvard University) have worked out an FRB rate for each galaxy within 100 Gpc3 of about 10-5 per day, if indeed we are dealing with natural sources like gamma ray bursts or neutron star mergers. And as they’ve noted in a recent paper, one of these going off in our own galaxy, as would be expected about every 300 years, would resolve the question of FRB origins, a doubtless spectacular event if occurring nearby.

The Gajjar et al. paper reporting on the 2017 repeat detections is “Highest-frequency detection of FRB 121102 at 4-8 GHz using the Breakthrough Listen Digital Backend at the Green Bank Telescope,” accepted at The Astrophysical Journal (preprint). The Zhang et al. paper covering the subsequent new analysis is “Fast Radio Burst 121102 Pulse Detection and Periodicity: A Machine Learning Approach,” accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal, with further details available here. Avi Loeb and Minasvi Lingam’s paper on technological possibilities in FRBs is “Fast Radio Bursts from Extragalactic Light Sails,” The Astrophysical Journal Letters Vol. 837, No. 2 (March 8, 2017). Abstract / preprint.


Comments on this entry are closed.

  • Thomas R Mazanec September 11, 2018, 14:38

    Do these FRBs have any similarity to the WOW! signal, the eleven mentioned by Sagan in his Pale Blue Dot, or the signal received from TYC 1220-91-1?

    • ljk September 12, 2018, 14:24

      No. They are all much, much closer than the FRBs, namely being well within the Milky Way galaxy.

  • Gary Wilson September 11, 2018, 16:42

    Sorry for my ignorance on this subject but what are the closest FRB that have been detected and located to a specific region? Do FRB co-locate with any astronomical phenomena that we can understand? FRB from 3 billion light years away are interesting but if they are SETI then they are 3 billion year old artifacts. The closer to home we can detect FRB the better for a number of reasons, including identification of the source. I hope to see much more about this subject.

    • Eniac September 17, 2018, 19:17

      We might not want one at 3 Ly distance. If it is a billion times closer, it will be 18 orders of magnitude brighter. That might be quite uncomfortable. We are probably seeing stars being swallowed by a black hole or something else of that magnitude.

  • Robin Datta September 11, 2018, 18:46

    Would it be useful to enlist the help of the cryptographic community (and perhaps the NSA) to seek patterns that might suggest intelligent (at our human level) intent in the FRBs?

    • Curious September 11, 2018, 23:34

      And/or make the data available and arrange some type of public crypto challenge as was once popular in the UK. Use the internet to harness the power of perhaps a million minds to sleuth a pattern.

  • Harry R Ray September 26, 2018, 10:59

    Paul Gilster: Are you in Houston to attend the NASA Technosignatures Conference which just started? If you are, and you come across Steinn Sigurdsson, I would like you to ask him a question regarding ArXiv: 1809.09615. “The Anita Analogus Events as Signatures of a Beyond Standard Model Particle, and Supporting Observations from Ice Cube.” by Derek B Fox, Steinn Sigurdsson, Sara Shandera, Peter Meszaros, Kohta Murase, Miguel Mostafa, Stephanie Coutu. The authors claim that the ANITA Analoguous Events are NOW CONFIRMED! NO Standard Model particle can account for these events, so the authors postulate that these events are the result of a NATURAL PROCESS involving some as yet to be determined Beyond Standard Model particle. I postulate that, instead; it may be a non-natural process involving standard model particles MANIPULATED in a way nature can NEVER DO to send us a MESSAGE! I know you are sensitive to OT, so I posted this HERE(because Lingham and Loeb speculate that FRB’s MAY be technosignatures) instead of your most recent `Oumuamua post(despite my conention that `Oumuamua may ALSO be a technosignature),

    • Paul Gilster September 26, 2018, 12:25

      I couldn’t travel to Houston, I’m afraid, so won’t be seeing Dr. Sigurdsson. Wish I could have been there.

  • Harry R Ray September 26, 2018, 11:09

    OOPS! In my excitement, I forgot to post the Question I wanted you to ask Dr Sigurdsson, which is: Is a SETI non-BSM particle “message” solution a viable alternative to the proposed natural BSM particle solution? Either way, this has STAGGERING IMPLICATIONS!

  • ljk January 18, 2019, 11:05

    14 January 2019

    Breakthrough Listen announces release of 400 terabytes of Green Bank Telescope data from the repeating fast radio burst FRB 121102

    Last week, the CHIME collaboration announced the discovery of 13 new FRBs, including the discovery of another “repeater” (FRB 180814). As with FRB 121102, FRB 180814 exhibits remarkable spectral and temporal variability. This variability, together with the ultimate source of FRBs, remains unexplained.

    In August 2017, the Breakthrough Listen program conducted a five-hour observation of FRB 121102 using the Green Bank Telescope, as part of its campaign of targeting exotic and anomalous astronomical phenomena. The Listen team recorded around 380 TB of baseband voltage data collected with the Breakthrough Listen digital backend (MacMahon et al. 2018, PASP, 130, 044502), observing across 4 to 8 GHz. These unique data have already led to a number of discoveries. An initial search found around 21 pulses, with emission seen up to 8 GHz, the highest frequency FRBs have ever been observed (Gajjar et al. 2018, ApJ, 863, 9). These pulses were used to investigate the polarization properties of the source, and it was found that FRB 121102 is embedded in a highly dense and magnetized environment (Michilli D. 2018, Nature, 553, 182). Later in 2018, we used novel machine learning tools to search these data and found 72 new bursts (Zhang et al. 2018, ApJ, 866, 149).

    Today we are releasing the entire baseband raw-voltage dataset collected during these observations, totaling nearly 400 TB. This data release marks the first time raw voltage data for FRB detections have been released to the public. We hope that the citizen science and engineering community will help us to utilize these data to their maximum potential and extract the additional insights in to FRBs that surely lie buried within them.

    The data are available for download through the Breakthrough Initiatives Open Data Portal: under target name FRB121102.

    The files are large and in technical formats, as described below.