≡ Menu

Deep Space Network: A Laser Communications Future

Recent updates to the Deep Space Network have me thinking about the data capabilities of laser communications, and how they will change the way missions operate. In late October, a payload called the Laser Communications Relay Demonstration (LCRD) is scheduled for launch aboard an Atlas V from Cape Canaveral. LCRD will begin its work by receiving radio frequency test signals from the mission operations center and responding with optical signals. Ultimately, the mission should be able to receive data from other missions and relay to the ground.

What we have here is NASA’s first technology demonstration of a two-way laser relay system, one that will test laser capabilities to find out, for example, about the potentially disruptive effect of clouds. Because optical signals cannot penetrate them, plans are for LCRD to transmit data from missions to separate ground stations, one in Table Mountain, California and the other at Haleakalā in Hawaii, both chosen because of their low degree of annual cloud coverage.

Also slated for late 2021 is the Terabyte Infrared Delivery (TBIRD) mission, which will demonstrate laser downlinks of 200 gigabits per second, again enlarging the agency’s capabilities at designing laser systems for small satellites.

Image: The Laser Communications Relay Demonstration payload is attached to the LCRD Support Assembly Flight (LSAF), which can be seen in this image. The LSAF serves as the backbone for the LCRD components. Attached to the LSAF are the two optical modules, which generate the infrared lasers that transmit data to and from Earth. A star tracker is also attached here. These components are visible on the left side of this image. Other LCRD components, such as the modems that encode data into laser signals, are attached to the back of the LSAF. Credit: Goddard Space Flight Center.

All of this is by way of looking at how communications are evolving, and how capacity must grow with technology, for the 39 missions the Deep Space Network regularly supports are scheduled to be joined by another 30 NASA missions in development. The network’s tracking antennas are found at Goldstone (near Barstow, CA), in Robledo de Chavela, Spain; and in Canberra, Australia. Two new antennas have added capacity, taking the DSN from 12 to 14. You can track ongoing operations on the DSN on this mesmerizing page.

You’ll recall the issues with DSS-43, the 70-meter DSN antenna at Canberra (see Voyager 2: Back in Two-Way Communication). This is the only southern hemisphere dish with a transmitter in the needed S-band frequency range and powerful enough to send commands to Voyager 2, and it took 11 months of upgrades to resolve problems with its aging equipment. Voyager 1 is able to communicate through the two northern hemisphere DSN stations, but Voyager 2’s course following the Neptune encounter in 1989 was pushed well south of the ecliptic.

JPL’s Brad Arnold is manager of the Deep Space Network:

“The refresh of DSS-43 was a huge accomplishment, and we’re on our way to take care of the next two 70-meter antennas in Goldstone and Madrid. And we’ve continued to deliver new antennas to address growing demand – all during COVID-19.”

Image: DSS43 is a 70-meter-wide (230-feet-wide) radio antenna at the Deep Space Network’s Canberra facility in Australia. It is the only antenna that can send commands to the Voyager 2 spacecraft. Credit: NASA/Canberra Deep Space Communication Complex.

The upgrades are occurring at a time when data flowing through the network has grown by a factor of 10 since the 1960s, with the prospect of much higher data volumes to come. Hence the interest in optical strategies to enable higher-bandwidth communication. Improvements in automation allow operators to oversee multiple links to spacecraft simultaneously, so the sequencing and execution of tracking passes can be fully automated. While waiting for optical methods to mature, the network is also using new protocols for the reception of multiple signals from a single antenna, splitting them in a digital receiver as a way to boost network efficiency.

When it comes to the data overload problem, laser communication is the next step, and the groundwork has continued during the past decade. In 2013, the Lunar Laser Communications Demonstration (LLCD) used a laser signal to enable fast upload and download rates (600 megabits per second) on two simultaneous high-definition video channels. LLCD was followed in 2014 by the Optical Payload for Lasercomm Science (OPALS) experiment, a demonstration onboard the International Space Station. 2017 saw the Optical Communications and Sensor Demonstration mission (OCSD), in which high-speed laser communications were demonstrated via downlink from a CubeSat to ground stations.

Meanwhile, we can look forward to the Psyche mission, scheduled for launch in 2022, in which the onboard Deep Space Optical Communications (DSOC) payload will test laser communications in a mission to an asteroid 240 million kilometers away.

We get serious advantages not just in terms of bandwidth but also in transmission and reception of signals by going this route. The diffraction rate of a radio signal is determined by the wavelength of the signal divided by the diameter of the antenna. Push into higher frequency ranges and the signal becomes narrower, offering advantages in a crowded spectrum. The DSS-43 communications with Voyager 2 make the issues stark. Because of beam diffraction, the Voyager signal now swells to over a thousand times the diameter of the Earth.

Putting this into more futuristic terms: A 20-watt laser signal beamed back to Earth from Alpha Centauri via an installation about the size of the Hubble Space Telescope would reach us. Our current capabilities extend out into the Kuiper Belt, but star-to-star is out of the question. Back in 1989, the signal we received from Voyager 2’s 23 watts was twenty billion times weaker than the power it would take to operate a digital wristwatch, yet the DSN could pluck the signal out of deep space to deliver the data. If we had a Voyager 2 entering Alpha Centauri space, its signal would be 81 million times weaker than that. Going interstellar means going to lasers.

And beyond that? Claudio Maccone has demonstrated mathematically what might be done with a communications relay at the Sun’s gravitational focus beyond 550 AU. Going more futuristic still, a network of interstellar communications could one day grow from similarly placed relays around nearby stars. The efficiencies of a network like that — if we can find a way to put one in place — are breathtaking. See The FOCAL Radio Bridge for more.

On the laser signal at Alpha Centauri, see Lesh, C. J. Ruggier, and R. J. Cesarone, “Space Communications Technologies for Interstellar Missions,” Journal of the British Interplanetary Society 49 (1996): 7–14. For more on gravitational lensing and communications, see Maccone, “Interstellar Radio Links Enhanced by Exploiting the Sun as a Gravitational Lens,” Acta Astronautica Vol. 68, Issues 1-2 (January-February 2011), pp. 76-84 (abstract/full text).

tzf_img_post
{ 10 comments… add one }
  • Alex Tolley September 2, 2021, 15:28

    Going more futuristic still, a network of interstellar communications could one day grow from similarly placed relays around nearby stars. The efficiencies of a network like that — if we can find a way to put one in place — are breathtaking.

    But how practical? Unless I misunderstand the requirements, to connect just 2 stars via a 3rd in a network requires that the 3rd star has 2 transmitter-receivers at different places on the minimum focal surface. Each has to communicate with the other to act as a network node. For 2 components at opposite sides of the sun, a single signal takes 6 days to cross the space from one transmitter-receiver to the other. On top of this, the placement of the node components must constantly change as stars move relative to each other over time. Maintaining any sort of network even over a few hundred ly will be a formidable challenge, even if we had FTL communication, let alone current light speed limited media.

  • Alex Tolley September 2, 2021, 15:40

    The upgrades are occurring at a time when data flowing through the network has grown by a factor of 10 since the 1960s

    This is a very interesting statistic as it indicates to me how little progress we have made in our deep space missions. 10x data rates could be sopped up just by increasing the bandwidth to get better resolution images and data. This growth must lag terrestrial communication growth by a huge factor.

    I am encouraged by the Cubesat laser communication demonstration [Optical Communications and Sensor Demonstration mission (OCSD)] as Cubsats and other tiny satellites and space probes may be an important component of our exploration of space. With the advent of reusable super heavy lift launchers reducing the cost of space access, we might yet reach a golden age of sensors spreading out into our system monitoring and mapping the planets and other smaller bodies of our system. These will all best be communicating by some equivalent of an internet in space to route and deliver signals to any number of destinations. Just as terrestrial communications has added myriads of edge computing devices that collect image and other data for a wide variety of tasks so that sensor net should spread out into deep space to include the rest of our system, and beyond.

    • Paul Gilster September 2, 2021, 20:12

      Alex, I had exactly the same response when I found that statistic about data growth!

  • David Herne September 2, 2021, 23:20

    I’m currently working a project on the effect of thin clouds on IR LASER communications, so this great piece is particularly relevant for me – thank you! When the sky is not completely clear of clouds, often those clouds hanging about are thin, high level, wispy cirrus. The question is, how much cloud can ground to spacecraft IR LASER communications handle? I’m looking at the optical depth of thin clouds and their likely impact on communications. I’ve only recently begun this work, so, fun times.

    • Paul Gilster September 3, 2021, 5:18

      David, glad to hear the piece is useful. Please keep us posted on your work.

  • Alex Tru September 3, 2021, 3:07

    Going interstellar means going to lasers.

    Very speculative and misleading statement…
    Sounds like fundraising slogan , than reflection of reality…

  • Michael Fidler September 3, 2021, 10:08

    That could make this a good case for a Lunar Base, otherwise high mountain tops would be the best locations. It will be interesting to see how StarLink lasers will work, maybe they could just link into the internet from deep space! ;-}

    • Michael Fidler September 3, 2021, 10:51

      But the ping leaves a lot to be desired!

      • Alex Tolley September 3, 2021, 13:28

        How are you finding Starlink as your carrier?

        • Michael Fidler September 3, 2021, 17:37

          Still waiting for the beta here in the Philippines.

Leave a Comment