Probing Radiation Hazards to Future Missions

by | Jul 16, 2007 | Outer Solar System | 1 comment

A human presence in space is one day going to mean something more than putting a crew into low Earth orbit or even going to the Moon. But longer journeys — to Mars, to Jupiter’s moons and beyond — count among their many challenges the problem of radiation. To solve it, we’ll have to start closer to home, puzzling out our own local radiation hazards from the Van Allen belts, those regions of high-energy electrons and ions caught within the magnetic field of Earth.

Because electromagnetic waves can accelerate electrons, causing so-called ‘enhancement events’ or surges that are up to a thousand times more dense than the norm. The danger to spacecraft electronics can be acute. A powerful solar storm in 2003, for example, caused instrument damage to several spacecraft and may have been the cause of the loss of two Japanese satellites. We’re learning that we need radiation-hardened systems that can withstand such battering.

The 2003 event — actually two storms that occurred back to back in October and November — began to offer clues to the process. So intense were these storms that part of the Van Allen radiation belt was drained of electrons and reformed much closer to Earth. A theory known as ‘radial diffusion’ suggested how the radiation belts should intensify as they reformed (an effect thought to be driven by solar activity), but that didn’t happen. Scientists using data from the European Space Agency’s Cluster mission were then able to show that very low frequency electromagnetic waves can cause the particle acceleration needed to intensify the belts.

Now a new paper out of Los Alamos National Laboratory looks at how the acceleration process works. Using data from three different satellites, the team measured electron fluxes and converted physical measurements to magnetic coordinates. The study confirmed that localized peaks have to be caused by the acceleration of the electrons by electromagnetic waves. Says Los Alamos’ Yue Chen, lead author of the paper: “Debates on the source of the acceleration have lasted for at least a decade, and this paper finally settles the argument based on observations.”

Which is a start, but the exact nature of the interaction is not yet understood. NASA will launch two missions in 2012 in an attempt to probe how the radiation belts are created and decay, with the goal of producing enough empirical data to aid in the design of future radiation-hardened vehicles, and of providing better forecast models to predict geomagnetic storm activity. The paper is Yue Chen et al., “The energization of relativistic electrons in the outer Van Allen radiation belt,” Nature Physics 1 July 2007. It’s a reminder of how far we have to go in our understanding of even the near-Earth environment, much less such vast radiation wastelands as we’ll find around planets like Jupiter.

1 Comment

  1. Scientists are going to have to figure out ways to have humans live within “radiation belts,” as many potential worlds in our own solar system (Europa, Saturn’s ring worlds, Uranus’s worlds, Neptune’s Titan) orbit within these fields.

    Hopefully artificial magnetic fields could resolve these, as I would hate to skip half of the solar system because they are deemed unfit to live.

Now Reading

Charter

In Centauri Dreams, Paul Gilster looks at peer-reviewed research on deep space exploration, with an eye toward interstellar possibilities. For many years this site coordinated its efforts with the Tau Zero Foundation. It now serves as an independent forum for deep space news and ideas. In the logo above, the leftmost star is Alpha Centauri, a triple system closer than any other star, and a primary target for early interstellar probes. To its right is Beta Centauri (not a part of the Alpha Centauri system), with Beta, Gamma, Delta and Epsilon Crucis, stars in the Southern Cross, visible at the far right (image courtesy of Marco Lorenzi).

Recent Posts

On Comments

If you'd like to submit a comment for possible publication on Centauri Dreams, I will be glad to consider it. The primary criterion is that comments contribute meaningfully to the debate. Among other criteria for selection: Comments must be on topic, directly related to the post in question, must use appropriate language, and must not be abusive to others. Civility counts. In addition, a valid email address is required for a comment to be considered. Centauri Dreams is emphatically not a soapbox for political or religious views submitted by individuals or organizations. Human comments only, please -- cut and paste from AI will not be acceptable. A long form of the policy can be viewed on the Administrative page. The short form is this: If your comment is not on topic and respectful to others, I'm probably not going to run it.


Advanced Propulsion Research

Beginning and End

Archives