≡ Menu

Probing an Ancient Planetary System

The red dwarf known as Kapteyn’s Star — the name comes from the 19th Century Dutch astronomer Jacobus Kapteyn — is about thirteen light years from Earth in the southern constellation of Pictor, close enough that a small telescope can pick it out. Kapteyn’s efforts at cataloguing the star in 1898 revealed that it had the highest proper motion of any star then known, a position it lost with the discovery of Barnard’s Star in 1916. Because I find stellar encounters interesting, I’ll note that about 11,000 years ago, Kapteyn’s Star would have come within seven light years of the Sun. It has been moving away from us ever since.

Kapteyn’s Star belongs to the galactic halo, a dispersed population of stars on elliptical orbits that wraps around the galactic disk and bulge. It is the nearest known halo star to the Sun. We now know, through the efforts of an international research team, that at least two planets are found here. Kapteyn c is a ‘super-Earth’ with an orbit of 121 days, while Kapteyn b comes in at about five Earth masses and orbits the star every 48 days, potentially making it warm enough for liquid water to exist on the surface. Bear in mind that this is the 25th nearest star to the Sun, a star with a history that evidently includes birth in an original dwarf galaxy now known as Omega Centauri, which was long ago absorbed and disrupted by its encounter with the Milky Way.


Image: Kapteyn’s Star and its planets likely come from a dwarf galaxy now merged with the Milky way. The bottom right panel shows characteristic streams of stars resulting from such a galactic merging event. Credit: Victor Robles, James Bullock, and Miguel Rocha at University of California Irvine and Joel Primack at University of California Santa Cruz.

The paper explains this intriguing background and estimates the star’s age:

The age of Kapteyn’s star can be inferred from its membership to the Galactic halo and peculiar element abundances (Kotoneva et al. 2005). The current hierarchical Milky Way formation scenario suggests that streams of halo stars were originated as tidal debris from satellite dwarf galaxies being engulfed by the early Milky Way (Klement 2010, and references therein). This scenario is supported by the age estimations of the stars in the inner halo (~10-12 Gyr, Jofré & Weiss 2011), and globular clusters. The work by Eggen and collaborators… established the existence of such high-velocity, metal-poor moving groups in the solar neighborhood. Kapteyn’s star is the prototype member of one of these groups…

So we’re dealing with an ancient star with an age not likely to be less than 10 billion years, and perhaps much older (the obvious upper cut-off being 13.7 billion years). The paper speculates that detecting two super-Earths around Kapteyn’s Star is consistent with the idea that low-metallicity stars tend to produce low-mass planets rather than gas giants, an idea supported by the small number of low mass planets found in radial velocity searches of metal-rich stars.

It’s also interesting to consider, as the paper does, that at the likely age of the Kapteyn’s Star system, most G and K dwarfs would be evolving away from the main sequence into giants, which would make detecting planets around them through Doppler methods all but impossible because of the high level of solar activity. The result: If we want to learn about the oldest planetary systems in the galaxy, we’ll need to turn to low-mass stars like this one, which remain on the main sequence and will stay there for a long time to come.

If you’re a science fiction fan, you’ll want to check out this news release from the University of London, which interweaves within the text a short story by Alastair Reynolds called ‘Sad Kapteyn.’ The tale describes in just a few paragraphs the arrival of a robotic interstellar probe at the Kapteyn’s Star planetary system. Reynolds is always worth reading (the Revelation Space novels in particular), and I quote him here as he recounts the AI probe’s discovery of a long-dead civilization on Kapteyn b:

“Continent-sized craters mar Kapteyn b, and I wonder if they speak of some truly awesome catastrophe – a cosmic accident, or something worse? Whatever the case, the builders of these cities are long gone. Perhaps they were dead even before Kapteyn’s star was snatched from the clutches of its mother galaxy.

“At the risk of inferring too much from too little data, I can’t help indulging in a little speculation. I too was the product of a technological civilisation, with the capability to transform a planet, to colonise other moons and worlds, to build daunting structures. The people of Kapteyn b were clearly more advanced than you, my own builders – but given time, you too could have transformed a world in this manner.

“Something to think about, isn’t it?”

The paper is Anglada-Escudé et al., “Two planets around Kapteyn’s star: a cold and a temperate super-Earth orbiting the nearest halo red-dwarf,” accepted at Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (preprint).


Comments on this entry are closed.

  • Harry R Ray June 4, 2014, 10:40

    Most G-K stars as old as Kaptyen’s star ARE too variable to detect small planets using the radial velocity technique. There are noticeable exceptions,however! Case in point: Kepler 10, which is estimated to be 11 billion years old! A week ago, I would have said that both of these planets would ALMOST CERTAINLY BE mini-neptunes, however, now I actually FAVOR completely rocky super-earths! If the mass of the “cold planet is in the upper range for super-earths(8-10Me), it coula ALSO be habitable if it generated enough internal heat.

  • Volucris June 4, 2014, 18:21

    Fun fact: Kapteyn’s star is orbiting Milky Way in retrograde orbit – I hadn’t come to think such things exist at all!
    If primary means of interstellar travel, and spreading of some life-form across galaxy was just basically sitting around and waiting for other stars to pass by close and then make short jumps on opportunity, these retrograde stars might provide “base camps” of choice. With it’s velocity with respect to solar system, it covers a light year in about a 1000 years.

  • RobFlores June 5, 2014, 13:55

    Well, talk about a system so close and it might as well be at the edge
    of the galaxy. Until space drives lower the cost of expending
    delta vee, to cancel, then reverse your galactic orbital speed, traveling
    to Kapteyns’ star and Do the same thing Delta vee trick to get back to
    Earth is childs play then a visitation could be made.

    Our Galactic Orbital speed is about, 220 Km/Sec so a total change in velocity of 880 Km/sec for a round trip. And that’s just to be on a similar vector. Doesn’t include actual Delta vee too come up to you cruise speed. ( I know both systems not in the same plane, I simplified things so sue me)

  • andy June 5, 2014, 17:30

    So dwarf galaxies should not be ruled out as environments that can host planets, potentially even habitable ones. Given that at least some globular clusters are the remnant cores of dwarf galaxies, perhaps these environments may still host low mass planets around stars which have managed to avoid falling into the cluster core. Finding them might be quite tricky though: unfortunately as far as I can tell there weren’t any globulars in the Kepler field.

  • Andrew LePage June 6, 2014, 9:16

    As seems to happen all too often with discoveries like this, the potential habitability of Kapteyn b is probably being overblown more than a bit in the press. Because it was discovered using a Doppler velocity technique, all we know about this world (aside from its orbit which is admittedly comfortably inside the HZ of Kapteyn’s Star) is its minimum mass. Given this minimum mass of ~4.8 times that of the Earth and a random orientation of its orbit to our line of sight, there is about a 50-50 chance that Kapteyn b has a mass in excess of 10 Earth-masses and in all probability is a mini-Neptune (or larger) incapable of supporting life. And even if Kapteyn b has a mass in the 5 to 10 Earth-mass range, there is still the possibility that it is a member of the recently recognize class of planet called a gas dwarf which is also unlikely to support life. The issues surrounding the claim of the habitability of Kapteyn b are discussed in detail in the following fully-referenced review: