≡ Menu

Hybrid Strategies for Deep Space

On Monday I touched on the topic of multi-modal spacecraft, wondering whether future deep space missions might carry twin or even triple systems of propulsion. The example I want to tinker with is an interstellar craft driven by beamed energy, akin to some of Robert Forward’s designs in the 1980s. Forward went through enormous challenges trying to decelerate at the destination, though as we’ll see, he did come up with more than one solution.

A beamed laser sailcraft runs into this problem because the power source is in a close solar orbit, while the craft is reaching speeds that make a human crossing to another star possible. How to slow it down from behind? Deceleration is going to take a long time no matter what the method, but if we factor in a second mode of propulsion, a magnetic sail, we can brake against the destination star’s stellar wind. I mentioned on Monday as well that the Venture Star, the starship that got James Cameron’s crew to Alpha Centauri in the film Avatar, was depicted as a hybrid craft, with a Forward-style beamed lightsail to reach cruise and antimatter engines to slow upon arrival.

The Venture Star’s braking strategy involves the annihilation of matter and antimatter to heat up hydrogen propellant for thrust. Cameron’s use of enormous heat radiators also marks this craft, an indication that he tried for scientific accuracy where he could — Robert Frisbee is only one of the scientists who have noted the need to dissipate the heat from matter/antimatter reactions, and he was echoing the prescient Les Shepherd, who wrote about the issue back in 1952.

VentureStar

Image: The Venture Star wins points for accuracy in the details. Winchell Chung has a fine breakdown of its systems on his Project Rho site. Credit: 20th Century Fox.

Near-Term Steps

Hybrid ideas for spacecraft don’t have to wait for science fictional futures, because we’re already seeing interesting steps in this direction. When the Japanese space agency JAXA successfully launched and operated the IKAROS space sail, it demonstrated a unique system of spacecraft control. The liquid crystal films located near the edges of the sail were installed for attitude control. Their reflectivity could be altered by applying a voltage to the strips. Experimenting with the method in 2010, JAXA successfully demonstrated attitude control torque using the method, an adjustment of reflectivity that bodes well for future hybrid methods.

There are various ways of manipulating a sailcraft’s attitude, all of them analyzed mathematically in Giovanni Vulpetti’s book Fast Solar Sailing (Springer, 2012), one of them being the change in reflectance used on IKAROS. I won’t get into the details, though you can find them in the book I’ve been tapping this week for ideas, Solar Sails: A Novel Approach to Interplanetary Travel, soon to be released by Springer in its second edition.

Manipulating vanes on a segmented sail, using small sails at the boom ends of the spacecraft, even the use of small rockets has been suggested. But sail reflectance and its alteration point us in new directions. Let me quote from Solar Sails on this:

The concept of thrust maneuvering for solar-photon sails is…more general than sail attitude control via mechanical actuators of conventional and/or advanced type. The above-mentioned experiment on IKAROS appears as a special device opening a new ‘seam’ of very advanced spacecraft.

How we can use changes in reflectance to alter solar sail trajectories in space is now under investigation at the University of Rome, a goal being to develop a comprehensive thrust model. That’s interesting stuff, because multiple attitude control systems give every indication of being both efficient and more fault-tolerant, since you’re carrying a backup system on-board. The suspicion here is that we’ve only begun to realize how these methods may affect future propulsion strategies as well. But it may be that JAXA is thinking well ahead on this matter.

ikaros_panels

Image: The IKAROS sail, a hybrid design with attached solar cells. Note the solar cells in blue, used to change the spacecraft’s attitude. Credit: JAXA.

For IKAROS has already demonstrated sail deployment, attitude control and maneuverability, as well as showing — with its on-board gamma-ray burst detector — the ability of sails to serve as a platform for science missions. Scaling up such missions for further testing lies ahead, and the success of IKAROS has spurred the agency to continue with an ambitious sail mission to Jupiter that could be launched as early as 2020. Here we’re talking about another hybrid design, one that would use gravitational assists, a solar sail, and an ion engine to explore Jupiter’s magnetosphere, with an additional task of a flyby of at least one of Jupiter’s Trojan asteroids.

So we’re combining propulsive methods in this mission, one that should build our experience with the kind of maneuvering that may one day be used on ‘Sundiver’ missions that perform close flybys of the Sun. Called the Jupiter Magnetosphere Orbiter (JMO), the mission’s sail will upgrade the original IKAROS. Based on what has been published so far, it will be a square sail that measures about 100 meters to the side and like IKAROS will use a 7.5 micron polyimide for the sail material. The mass of sail and associated structure including inflatable booms should be in the range of 150 kilograms, with a total mass (including payload) in the range of 250 kilograms.

The Interstellar Hybrid

Giovanni Vulpetti’s name has kept coming up with respect to multi-modal propulsion because as I’ve investigated the concept, I’ve realized he has been studying what he calls ‘multiple propulsion mode’ for many years. At the end of this post I give references for two papers on the matter, the first (“Multiple Propulsion Concept: Theory and Performance”) dating back as far as 1979. In 1992, Vulpetti discussed a deep space vehicle driven by nuclear ion propulsion and a solar sail, much like the JMO spacecraft, at the first World Space Congress in Washington, DC.

The concept here is staging, but instead of coupling stages that each use the same propulsion strategy, we’ll use entirely different propulsion techniques. Staged propulsion spacecraft (this is Vulpetti’s term) are more or less forced upon us as we ponder the complexities of interstellar missions. Gregory Matloff, a fellow author of Vulpetti and Les Johnson on the Solar Sails book, was able to get mission times to Alpha Centauri — for a solar sail using a sundiver approach to the Sun — down to roughly 1000 years in papers he wrote for the Journal of the British Interplanetary Society in the 1980s. But solar sails are efficient only near a star. Can we use a solar sail by itself for needed deceleration?

More likely is the scenario where a sail or fusion-powered starship at least supplements its primary propulsion with something like a magnetic sail for years-long braking against the stellar wind in the destination system. [Addendum: As noted in the comments, braking against a stellar wind won’t be a ‘years-long’ process because at these speeds the probe would cross the heliosphere within days. I was really thinking about braking against the interstellar medium, an idea that grows out of Bussard’s ramscoop ideas and the drag they have been found to create]. Tomorrow I’ll mention some of Robert Forward’s notions about the deceleration dilemma including staged sails, and explore other options, which hybrid missions seem to trump.

Giovanni Vulpetti’s papers on hybrid spacecraft include “Multiple Propulsion Concept: Theory and Performance,” JBIS 32 (June, 1979), pp. 209-214; and “Multiple Propulsion Concept for Interstellar Flight: General Theory and Basic Results,” JBIS 43 (December, 1990).

tzf_img_post

Comments on this entry are closed.

  • Alex Tolley November 6, 2014, 14:08

    The performance of sail propulsion will depend on sail density and the strength of the impinging particles (protons or photons). Solar flux of photons is fixed, so sail density is key for solar sails. Beaming is one way to increase the flux. My thought is – can we do significantly better than estimates of ultimate sail density suggest? It is possible to sail downwind faster than the wind on a surface. Is there any way we might be able to do this off a surface?

    On this theme, can we design spinning “bladed” devices (e.g. wind turbine shapes) that could extract the energy of the solar wind, rather than being a putative “solid” sail (e.g. the multi-wired electric sail)? IOW, could a shaped electric/magnetic field on a rapidly spinning wire offer very low densities, while possibly also acting as a screw or propeller in the solar wind? (I’m guessing that the “blade” speed through the medium must be much faster than the medium itself – i.e. >> 400 km/s

    The OP mentions a hybrid design for the JMO mission that uses solar sails, an ion engine and Jupiter’s gravitational assist. Would it be possible to use Jupiter’s strong magnetic field as an assist? Here current carrying wires would generate the needed motive force? (Deep Space Propulsion via Magnetic Fields). In this case, an electric sail design might work well here – a current for magnetic propulsion and a static charge for capturing the solar wind.

    We often think of sail ships as clipper ships – i.e. using large surfaces to capture or direct the wind to move. But modern ships use screws. There have also been numerous wind turbine designs that offer advantages over canvas sails, even if they are not as aesthetic to the eye. (Clipper ships were possibly the most pleasing ship designs ever built). Might we be thinking too much in terms of sails that mimic the romance of traditional sails, rather than designs that might offer better performance, albeit with some aesthetic loss?

  • Andrew Palfreyman November 6, 2014, 15:50

    This is quite brilliant. The design space is intimidating.

  • Andrew Palfreyman November 6, 2014, 16:35

    [My ambiguous “this” referred to Alex Tolley’s comment]

  • Eniac November 6, 2014, 22:02

    I don’t think there is any chance for “years-long braking against the stellar wind” at the target system. At the speeds we would like, the entire heliosphere should be whizzing by in just a few days, not much time to catch a breeze. Certainly not years.

    Consequently, any braking by sail would have to be against the interstellar medium, which is made difficult by the fact that the ISM is primarily made of neutral hydrogen atoms, at least in our neighborhood.

  • Paul Gilster November 7, 2014, 9:59

    Eniac writes:

    I don’t think there is any chance for “years-long braking against the stellar wind” at the target system. At the speeds we would like, the entire heliosphere should be whizzing by in just a few days, not much time to catch a breeze. Certainly not years.

    Quite right, Eniac. Braking against a stellar wind won’t be ‘years-long,’ as I wrote yesterday in all too much haste.

  • Giovanni Vulpetti November 7, 2014, 19:58

    The problem of deceleration of a starship via interstellar drag and other problems have been dealt with quantitatively by myself in “Giovanni Vulpetti, Dynamics of a Field-Sail Spaceship, Acta Astronautica, Vol. 21, No.10, pp. 679-687, Oct. 1990”. Full Relativistic dynamics was used.
    I could send a copy of my personal pdf-file to Paul who might prefer to create a hyper-link or something like.

  • Paul Gilster November 7, 2014, 22:34

    I’ll post this link next week when I receive the file. Thank you, Dr. Vulpetti. Much appreciated!

  • Eniac November 8, 2014, 23:55

    Dear Dr. Vulpetti,

    Thank you for this very interesting reference. If I read the paper correctly, you have assumed a static field for the interaction box that is not deformed or counteracted by currents induced in the plasma beam. As you must know, in plasma physics, we often have two-way interactions between the plasma and the field: Fields are just as much bent out of shape by plasma motion as plasma is deflected by fields. In particular, I have happened upon a paper by Alexander Bolonkin (http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0701/0701060.pdf), who seems to think that all work done on the subject of magnetic sails to date is invalid due to neglect of this effect.

    Could you please comment on this? Are you familiar with Bolonkin’s objection? Probably I have simply missed the part where this is considered and dealt with.

  • Paul D, November 12, 2014, 9:59

    My thought is – can we do significantly better than estimates of ultimate sail density suggest?

    Alex: I have wondered how low the density of a sail may become, if we abandon solid sails and instead use a plasma. Ions may have very large scattering cross sections near resonance (particularly ions like singly ionized magnesium with closed shells + 1 electron). One could imagine a magnetic sail that scatters both the interstellar plasma and some of the light from the star.

  • Eniac November 16, 2014, 0:18

    So, Paul, do you think Bolonkin is perhaps correct? The deafening silence that occurs among the experts whenever I try to bring up the subject makes me worry.

  • Paul Gilster November 16, 2014, 9:30

    I don’t know the answer, Eniac, but have some sail experts that I’ll float this past in the next few days. I hope we can get some opinions on this.