≡ Menu

Ozone Problematic for Biosignature Detection

TRAPPIST-1 and its seven interesting planets may be the most compelling stellar system we’re investigating, given the range of worlds here and the possibilities for analyzing an entire, nearby planetary system. But as we look toward examining systems like this with new space- and ground-based instruments, we may run into problems with searching for biosignatures. Both the TRAPPIST-1 planets and the promising Proxima Centauri b may be tough to characterize.

The problem: When searching for biosignatures, we’re looking for signs of metabolism, gases that are continually produced and remain out of balance in a planetary atmosphere. Ozone is one piece of the puzzle, one that signifies oxygen. Finding the latter in the same atmosphere with methane would be a compelling biosignature. But ozone could be hard to detect.

Ludmila Carone (Max Planck Institute for Astronomy) and colleagues now find that atmospheric circulation in planets close enough to red dwarfs to be in their habitable zone may mask the very signs we’re looking for. Ozone may become undetectable, trapped in equatorial regions.

The issue involves atmospheric flows, which will likely differ from what we see on Earth. The ozone in our stratosphere is formed when ultraviolet light from the Sun triggers chemical reactions in the oxygen molecules that make up approximately one-fifth of our atmosphere. The ozone protects us from harmful ultraviolet radiation from the Sun, and is distributed throughout the atmosphere owing to large-scale air flows moving from the equatorial regions to the poles.

Image: Earth’s atmosphere has a “transportation belt” of air flows which move ozone from the main production areas near the equator towards the poles. This mechanism is important for creating Earth’s global ozone layer. Credit: MPIA (L. Carone & Graphics Dept.)

The problem for exoplanetology is that red dwarf planets in orbits of less than 25 days may be tidally locked to their star, presenting the same face to it at all times. Tidal lock, which we’ve examined often in these pages, could conceivably still allow enough heat to circulate to avoid the kind of extremes between dark and light sides that could prevent life from emerging. But for planets like these, Carone’s models show major air flows moving in the opposite direction, from the poles to the equator. The ozone we seek, then, could be trapped in the equatorial region.

Image: As a new study by Ludmila Carone shows, certain exoplanets could have air flows that serve to trap ozone in the equatorial regions. This could present an unforeseen complication for the search for traces of life on these planets. For those who don’t speak German — my apologies, but I only have this image with German annotation. Credit: MPIA (L. Carone & Graphics Dept.)

This possibility is one we’ll need to consider as we begin the analysis of atmospheres on terrestrial-class planets around nearby red dwarfs. We may find no ozone on planets where ozone and oxygen might actually exist, though sequestered in places that might be difficult to detect. That’s a reverse take on the usual ‘false positive’ problem we’ve discussed here before, with abundant oxygen, for example, not necessarily being a marker for biological activity.

On the other hand, it’s worth asking whether a planet with ozone only in its equatorial regions would be capable of developing life in the first place. On that score, Carrone has an answer:

“In principle: yes. Proxima b and TRAPPIST-1d orbit red dwarfs, reddish stars that emit very little harmful UV-light to begin with. On the other hand, these stars can be very temperamental, and prone to violent outbursts of harmful radiation including UV. There is still a lot that we don’t know about these red dwarf stars. But I’m confident we will know much more in five years.”

True enough, assuming a successful launch of instruments like the James Webb Space Telescope, and the gradual emergence of the next generation of ground-based instruments. But as a marker for oxygen and potential life, exoplanet ozone may be a challenging detection.

The paper is Carone et al., “Stratosphere circulation on tidally locked ExoEarths,” Monthly Notes of the Royal Astronomical Society Vol. 473, Issue 4, pp. 4672-4685 (abstract).


Comments on this entry are closed.

  • andy November 30, 2017, 12:40

    There’s also the issue that multiple flares have the potential to cause severe ozone depletion on planets around red dwarfs, see this arXiv preprint.

  • Tom Mazanec November 30, 2017, 12:43

    Don’t forget…TRAPPIST-1 may have more than seven planets, if there are still undiscovered ones there.

  • Douglas Loss November 30, 2017, 16:36

    “Falle für chemische Verbindungen” means “trap for chemical compounds.” “Wie z. B. Ozon sowie Aerosole” means “for e. g. ozone as an aerosol.” “Dauer des Exo-Jahrs kürzer als 25 Tage” means “duration of exo-years shorter than 25 days.”

  • Mike November 30, 2017, 16:42

    It would be kind of neat if the one place where you needed the most screening from from UV flairs on a tidally-locked planet is the same place you have the most trapped ozone! I mean, if you wanted to live there.

  • Dr. Dianne S Widawsky November 30, 2017, 17:21

    How will newer telescope be able to see if ozone Is trapped just in equatorial regions. Be the focus of many red dwarf stars or TRAPPIST1?

  • Geoffrey Hillend November 30, 2017, 17:59

    If there is no methane, then we won’t have to worry about detecting ozone. It will be only trace amounts. The oxygen from the dissociation of water molecules into hydrogen an oxygen might not build up more than trace amounts of oxygen in an atmosphere over a geological time scale due to oxidation with the soil and rocks since life can replenish oxygen faster the dissociation from starlight. Hopefully, we can differentiate with spectroscopy an exoplanet with only trace amounts of oxygen and ozone from an Earth twin with large percentage of biologically produced oxygen which makes it easier to make ozone. There might be some dead exoplanets with a lot of oxygen but how rare are they? It seems to me that one needs life and a healthy biosphere to produce a good spectroscopic signature of oxygen in an exoplanet’s atmosphere. I can’t wait to see what our future telescopes with the capability for exoplanet spectroscopy will find. I’ll bet we will need an Earth twin with the same sized Moon for a good oxygen signature. This is a conservative view but it can’t fail provided it’s star is the same age and same size as our own.

  • Michael Poole November 30, 2017, 19:39

    “On the other hand, it’s worth asking whether a planet with ozone only in its equatorial regions would be capable of developing life in the first place.”

    Why not? Ozone requires free oxygen to arise and life has arisen on Earth back when there was no oxygen at all.

  • Michael Fidler December 1, 2017, 10:06

    Here is the arXiv version with new graphics and more details!

    Stratosphere circulation on tidally locked ExoEarths.
    Ludmila Carone, Rony Keppens, Leen Decin, Thomas Henning
    (Submitted on 29 Nov 2017)


  • Harry R Ray December 1, 2017, 10:28

    Andrew LePage: Why the heck do these authors(and others in OTHER RECENT PAPERS) now consider TRAPPIST 1-d to be the MOST habitable planet in the system? Initially Abel Mendez placed it in the optomistic habitable zone, despite its Teff being CLOSEST to Earth’s Teff, meaning that the most likely scenarios for it were that it either is a sub -Venus or a hot super-Mars with little to no atmosphere. THEN: On top of that, computations of the tidal friction it experiences would increase its SURFACE temperature to 320K! Am I missing something here?

  • ljk December 7, 2017, 10:24

    A Key to the Search for Alien Life? –“Earth’s Atmosphere has a Nitrogen Signature That’s Unique to Our Planet”


  • ljk December 7, 2017, 10:58

    Here we go: Bacteria living in Antarctica that subsist on air…


  • ljk December 8, 2017, 16:00