The imagery we’re getting of Jupiter’s polar regions is extraordinary. Juno’s Jovian Infrared Auroral Mapper instrument (JIRAM) works at infrared wavelengths, showing us a vivid picture of a massive central cyclone at the north pole and eight additional cyclones around it. In the image below, we’re looking at colors representing radiant heat, with yellow being thinner clouds at about -13 degrees Celsius, and dark red representing the thickest clouds, at about -118 degrees Celsius. JIRAM can probe down to 70 kilometers below the cloud tops.
Image: This composite image, derived from data collected by the Jovian Infrared Auroral Mapper (JIRAM) instrument aboard NASA’s Juno mission to Jupiter, shows the central cyclone at the planet’s north pole and the eight cyclones that encircle it. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SwRI/ASI/INAF/JIRAM.
This is hardly the orange, white and saffron belted world we are familiar with from telescope views of the lower latitudes. The scale of these storms is, as you would expect with Jupiter, quite impressive. Alberto Adriani is a Juno co-investigator based at the Institute for Space Astrophysics and Planetology in Rome:
“Prior to Juno we did not know what the weather was like near Jupiter’s poles. Now, we have been able to observe the polar weather up-close every two months. Each one of the northern cyclones is almost as wide as the distance between Naples, Italy and New York City — and the southern ones are even larger than that. They have very violent winds, reaching, in some cases, speeds as great as 350 kph. Finally, and perhaps most remarkably, they are very close together and enduring. There is nothing else like it that we know of in the solar system.”
Adriani’s work on the Jovian polar regions is part of a four-paper set of Juno findings just published in Nature (citations below). We also learn that the planet’s south pole likewise contains a central cyclone, surrounded by five other cyclones with diameters ranging from 5,600 to 7,000 kilometers (the eight northern circumpolar cyclones have diameters between 4,000 and 4,600 kilometers). As Adriani tellingly asks, “…why do they not merge?”
Contrast this situation with Saturn, which houses a single cyclonic vortex at each pole, and it becomes clear that the differences between gas giants can be striking. We also see evidence at Jupiter that the winds dominating its zones and belts run deep, a phenomenon put on display by gravity measurements Juno has collected during its close flybys. “Juno’s measurement of Jupiter’s gravity field indicates a north-south asymmetry, similar to the asymmetry observed in its zones and belts,” said Luciano Iess, Juno co-investigator from Sapienza University of Rome, and lead author on a Nature paper on Jupiter’s gravity field.
That such asymmetries in gravitational measurements exist — and the visible eastward and westward jet streams are likewise shown to be asymmetric — tells us a great deal about how deep these powerful flows extend. This JPL news release explains that the deeper the jets flow, the more massive they are, creating a stronger signal in the gravity field. Juno’s gravity asymmetries thus become a marker for how far down these weather patterns extend.
The massive Jovian weather layer, east-west flows extending to a depth on the order of 3,000 kilometers, contains about one percent of the planet’s mass. Yohai Kaspi, lead author of another of the recent papers in Nature explaining the result, says that seeing the depth of these weather jets and their structure takes us from a two- to a three-dimensional view, adding: “The fact that Jupiter has such a massive region rotating in separate east-west bands is definitely a surprise.” We have much work ahead to determine what drives these jet streams; their gravity signature is entangled with that of Jupiter’s core.
On that score, the surprises seem likely to continue. For a final Juno result now being released suggests that the planet rotates below its massive weather layer as a rigid body.
“This is really an amazing result, and future measurements by Juno will help us understand how the transition works between the weather layer and the rigid body below,” said Tristan Guillot, a Juno co-investigator from the Université Côte d’Azur, Nice, France, and lead author of the paper on Jupiter’s deep interior. “Juno’s discovery has implications for other worlds in our solar system and beyond. Our results imply that the outer differentially-rotating region should be at least three times deeper in Saturn and shallower in massive giant planets and brown dwarf stars.”
Let’s close with a Juno image of Jupiter’s south pole as processed from JunoCam imager data by citizen scientist Gerald Eichstädt.
Image: This image captures the swirling cloud formations around the south pole of Jupiter, looking up toward the equatorial region. NASA’s Juno spacecraft took the color-enhanced image during its eleventh close flyby of the gas giant planet on Feb. 7 at 1011 EST (1411 UTC). At the time, the spacecraft was 120,533 kilometers from the tops of Jupiter’s clouds at 84.9 degrees south latitude. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SwRI/MSSS/Gerald Eichstadt.
All four papers are in Nature 555 (8 March 2018). They are: Adriani et al., “Clusters of cyclones encircling Jupiter’s poles,” 216-219 (abstract); Iess et al., “Measurement of Jupiter’s asymmetric gravity field,” 220-222 (abstract); Kaspi et al., “Jupiter’s atmospheric jet streams extend thousands of kilometres deep,” 223-226 (abstract); and Guillot et al., “A suppression of differential rotation in Jupiter’s deep interior,” 227-230 (abstract).
I can’t help but wonder if at least some brown dwarfs may, at close range, look like the infrared north polar view of Jupiter, but have similar hues in *visible* light? Also:
The differences between Jupiter’s and Saturn’s polar cyclonic “scenes” are interesting, but perhaps not surprising. Jupiter is both more massive (roughly 318 Earths versus 95 Earths) and is closer to the Sun (about half a billion miles versus nearly a billion miles) than Saturn, so Jupiter should have a more energetic “gravitational compression internal heat source” as well as receiving more heat from the Sun (which is 1/27th its Earth-distance brightness at Jupiter, and only about 1/400th its Earth-distance intensity out at Saturn). Both of these heat sources would, it would seem, make Jupiter’s poles more meteorologically active than Saturn’s.
Meet the Woman Who Guides NASA’s Juno Probe Through Jupiter’s Killer Radiation
The probe launch from Florida in August 2011 was one of the most amazing moments of Becker’s life, she said. “I got to run outside and physically see it fly over my head,” she said. “To physically say goodbye to it and see it launch on its way to Jupiter is so awesome.” This also marked a transitional period. She was no longer an engineer, but a scientist documenting the effects of the Jovian atmosphere on the probe’s instruments, and more. Her work would reveal not just the limits of some of Earth’s best technology, but also help map the planet’s uncharted radiation belts.
Perhaps her most stressful moment after launch occurred while Juno returned to Earth’s orbit for a gravitational assist, as many planetary probes do, to help fling it towards Jupiter in 2013. The team had been hoping to test some of the science instruments when Juno unexpectedly entered safe mode, a near-complete systems shut down after detecting a problem. The issue was soon resolved, but “it was almost the complete opposite of the experience of the beauty of a launch,” she said. “It was a heart-stopping moment because you have no idea if you’re ever going to go or if you’re healthy until you’ve fully come out safe mode.”
I still cannot believe that they actually considered NOT putting a camera on Juno. I thought that kind of lack of foresight disappeared from the space program circa 1962.
Their second biggest mistake was actually considering putting a piece of Galileo Galilei aboard the probe, where it would have eventually been destroyed along with the rest of Juno when it plunges into the Jovian atmosphere. Thankfully they did not go through with that idea.
This is something that needs to be guarded against in future missions when budgets get tight, because it was suggested for Mariner 8 & 9, too! I read (in one of the NASA Mars exploration books) that the Mariner 8 (whose Atlas-Centaur failed) and Mariner 9 spacecraft also could have flown without cameras, as a cost-saving measure. After the 1969 Mariner 6 & 7 flybys made Mars appear to be even more geologically dull and hostile to life (we were *very* lucky that neither they nor Mariner 4 flew by during dust storms–Mariner 9, in Areocentric orbit, was able to study Mars’ moons instead while it waited out the storm!), the value of the upcoming orbiter missions was questioned, but:
Luckily, Mariners 8 and 9 were too far along in development for cancellation to be sensible. But with the smaller NASA budgets of the late 1960s and early 1970s, which the growing Space Shuttle program was already beginning to consume more and more of, other projects were being cancelled, postponed, or scaled back in order to pinch pennies, and:
Many people–amazingly–didn’t consider pictures to be scientifically very useful (even Arthur C. Clarke, in his 1957 book, “The Making of a Moon: The Story of the Earth Satellite Program,” wrote that lunar probe television close-ups of the Moon’s surface would be “Of great curiosity value, though probably of little scientific importance…”), and deletion of Mariner 8’s and 9’s TV cameras was suggested. Fortunately, several of the missions’ scientists pointed out the value of pictures in studies of Areology (Martian geology), meteorology, the morphology and features of Phobos and Deimos, etc., and both probes’ two vidicon TV cameras were retained. (Even Venus–as Mariner 10 showed–proved worthwhile to photograph, after Mariners 2 and 5 flew by it with no cameras at all.)
That is another continual problem with lunar and planetary exploration: People tend to think a few flybys or even an orbiter with lots of pretty pictures equals we fully understand an alien world. That is like having a few flybys of Earth if it were being visited for the first time and then declaring we know everything about that blue and white planet.
We have barely just started understanding our celestial neighborhood. We know about any and all life here beyond Earth past and present even less. We know even less than that about our galaxy.
It boggles my mind that NASA would have sent orbiters to Mars without cameras. Mariner 9 revolutionized our understanding of the Red Planet and its two moons with its cameras and made landing there possible. Charged particle data only excites a very select group of professionals.
Elon Musk knows how to do PR as well as launch rockets and get humanity excited about exploring and colonizing space, something I thought would have been able to sell itself but in the wrong hands I would guess not. I hope other space agencies both commercial and government are taking notes and ignoring the few naysayers who still do not seem to get why Musk lobbed his red sports car into interplanetary space.
Of course this amazement just makes the need for an ice giants mission all the more obvious. AGAIN :(
Anyone have a spare billion?
Ask this guy:
Either him or Musk and/or Besos. Milner has already revitalized SETI/METI with $100 million of his own money.
I just can’t help but wonder what do these gas giants look like after billions or perhaps trillions of years when they have lost or converted those wild atmospheres into something … other.
Do they leave behind large rocky bodies, small metallic bodies, mix and match of both, what sorts of deposits and mountains are exposed or deposited and when does a surface take form … what sorts of dynamic lumps do they turn into? What becomes of these atmospheres given enough time passage? Are any rocky planets or moons in our solar system remnants of what was once a gas giant? What changes does the core undergo throughout time? … First things first I suppose.
I must laugh at myself considering this, with all the gas giants, near or far from all the stars the imagination is only limited to what I am capable of imagining I suppose. The picture is magnificent in my opinion. A work of art, a thought provoking image, proof of the determination and absolute curiosity and capability of the human. The Universe and its people here on this world continue to just amaze me.
Astronomers used to think Jupiter and the other gas giants had solid rocky cores, perhaps the size of Earth and maybe even made of solid diamond from all that incredible pressure surrounding them.
However Juno’s data indicates that Jupiter at least may not have a solid core, so who knows what we will be left with if and when that world ever “wears out”.
While we do know much more about the Sol system than scientists did before the Space Age, we are only just catching 0n that a few reconnaissance missions hardly tell the whole story. And think how much we don’t know about all those other solar systems for which we barely know they have planets let alone any details. And we know even less about alien life, smart or otherwise.
The Cosmos either teaches you humility, or you find out the hard way.
I am musing about how we might determine if the core is solid or not. I am not being practical but more if it’s even possible given current technology, it’s rookie day here and these are my own ideas, I do not recall reading about this.
Submersibles and shooting anything through Jupiter whether spacecraft or signal is not possible from what I recall. The only thing I can come up with to determine with a test is to set up 2 arrays one on each side of the planet and get them to talk to each other or at least compare results. Talk to each other how? Sonar certainly won’t work, lasers won’t work from what I understand … what permeates that much matter? Gravity is the only thing I know of, but we yet don’t have the ability to send out gravitational waves .. I don’t think (maybe CERN makes small ones, I don’t know)
Ok, give me a go here. You set up 2 laser interferometers (LISA1 and LISA2). One set opposite the other set on both sides of Jupiter. Then you wait, wait for a gravitational wave to come in from an optimal position somewhere in space. LISA1 might show different results than LISA2 and from that extrapolate what occurred while it was passing through Jupiter? Is this plausible at all? Is this a new idea or has it been brought up before? Usually the world has thought of pretty much anything I can come up with so I am a little skeptical that I am being original here.
My god, it’s full of … cyclones
I am wondering if these features are common around worlds with extended atmospheres, Venus has a double vortex and Saturn has that strange hexagon formation. Perhaps as these worlds get bigger so do the number and strength of these features. Maybe Saturn’s features are the turning point when they turn into Jupiter like features.
In between the central(presumably AT the pole)cyclone and the eight cyclones surrounding it is a poorly defined “octagonal” shaped cloud structure that reminds me of Saturn’s famous polar hexagon. I now wonder if this is the process used to form the hexagon. Were there six cyclones surrounding the polar cyclone in the past, but were unable to remain stable enough to self-perpetuate themselves indefinitely? Will this be the case for the eight Jovian cyclones in the distant future, or will we, in some future era, see an octagon at this region of Jupiter?
Has anyone looked to see if there is any correlation between these storms and Jupiter’s aurora?
There is not correlation between Jupiter’s storms and Jupiter’s aurora because aurora are caused by charged particles in Jupiter’s magnetic field. There might be some charged particles in Earths’ thermosphere or ionosphere where the aurora are which is well above the troposphere. so aurora are considered to be space weather with the Earth and the same with Jupiter.
The solar maximum will affect the weather due to CME and more Sun spots and solar flares which increase cosmic rays and EMR. The CME’s that hit the magnetosphere will certainly increase the aurora activity and electric charge in our atmosphere if more electrons and protons are in the magnetosphere.
The Aurora are the result of charged particles trapped in the magnetic field, electrons and protons which move downward towards the Earth and collide with the atoms in the upper atmosphere where the magnetic field lines move down through the upper atmosphere where they continue into the Earth in the high norther latitudes. Increased aurora activity only the after affect as caused by the result of the solar minimum and maximum. They don’t cause a change in our weather on Earth or Jupiter, but yes there is a correlation between Earth’s weather and it’s aurora.
Also the mainstream idea in planetology or planetary meteorology is that Jupiter’s winds are driven by it’s deep inner heat source, the major cause of Jupiter’s winds and the effects of Sunlight are small compared to the inner source or affect only the top layer of the Jupiter’s atmosphere. Jupiter’s aurora are caused the same way as Earths aurora. Also Jupiter only receives a small fraction of the sunlight as Earth does and due to an inner source, Jupiter clearly emits more heat than it receives from the Sun.
The faces behind JunoCam: Justin Cowart
by Ocean McIntyre
March 26, 2018
Check out this quote from the above interview:
In the 1970s, famed astronomer and astrophysicist Carl Sagan lobbied heavily to add cameras to the twin Voyager spacecraft, which were initially designed without them. Those cameras would go on to produce some of the most iconic images of the Solar System to date. Since then, NASA has included camera’s on nearly every mission to other words.
Juno, however, almost didn’t have a camera. Due to Jupiter’s thick, impenetrable clouds, the Juno team hadn’t planned on including one as all of the instruments needed to see inside and below the clouds were those that had nothing to do with the visible spectrum of light.
Astronomers felt confident the data they needed wouldn’t come from images, but from the science of the things that were invisible to human eyes and only detectable using the specialized equipment. In the end, however, the team did opt to include a small camera almost as an afterthought, aimed specifically at public outreach. “JunoCam” was born.
Now if only Juno hadn’t been stuck in its wide orbit, we might have had a chance to get really closeup images of Jupiter’s clouds and then been able to search for floaters.
The faces behind JunoCam: Kevin Gill
By Ocean McIntyre
JunoCam is the sole camera on the Juno spacecraft orbiting Jupiter. The instrument’s primary purpose is to engage the public in citizen science. In fact, many of the raw images returned are processed by citizens with a passion for space exploration.
SpaceFlight Insider reached out to five of these individuals. The second in this series is Kevin Gill, a software engineer at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
The faces behind JunoCam: Sophia Nasr
SFI: Do you see your images more as art, science, or a combination of the two?
Nasr: “While my images are definitely art and you can’t really get scientific data from them, they depict physics in action, hence you cannot really remove the science aspect of it! For example, I may process an image that is absolutely art because it comes from raw images that are not calibrated, but it shows a physical phenomenon that I can describe to my followers thanks to that image I processed! Hence, I’d say they are a combination of the two—science and fantastic art!”
The faces behind JunoCam: Jason Major
The fifth and final in the SFI series on interviews with those folks involved with JunoCam:
SFI: What has the response been to your JunoCam images? Was that the response that you anticipated? What have you learned about the importance of public outreach in the process of processing JunoCam images?
Doran: “A little overwhelming to be honest. ?I shared my perijove 06 images over at UMSF not knowing there was a press conference announcing science results a day or two hence. So the timing was fortunate in that respect. It was unfortunate in that I consider those early processing attempts literally lackluster. I have learned a lot in 10 days! Also, it’s not really my work as so many people are responsible for putting those pixels in place before I even do what I do. [This was] not at all [expected].
I don’t think anyone is prepared for a social media onslaught, either positive or negative. I’m lucky in that everyone was universally positive in their response (except for that one guy who likened my image to a sheep’s butt) but I am highly aware of my own limitations. ?I think the standard has been set by the Mission Juno outreach. It is an excellent site with laudable goals.
Crowdsourcing the exploration of the Solar System? Sign me up!”
Remember when the idea of active volcanoes – or volcanoes at all – on a moon in the outer Sol system was once considered a wild, implausible idea?
Molten lava, an overcooked pizza, or the north pole of Jupiter?
Jatan Mehta • April 17, 2018
Space grade electronics: How NASA’s Juno survives near Jupiter
Six space missions that reminded us space exploration is hard.
Asteroids Smack Jupiter More Often Than Astronomers Thought
Article written: 26 April 2018
by David Dickinson
Are you keeping a eye on Jupiter? The King of the Planets, Jove presents a swirling upper atmosphere full of action, a worthy object of telescopic study as it heads towards another fine opposition on May 9th, 2018.
Now, an interesting international study out of the School of Engineering in Bilbao, Spain, the Astronomical Society of France, the Meath Astronomical Group in Dublin Ireland, the Astronomical Society of Australia, and the Esteve Duran Observatory in Spain gives us a fascinating and encouraging possibly, and another reason to keep a sharp eye on old Jove: Jupiter may just get smacked with asteroids on a more regular basis than previously thought.
The study is especially interesting, as it primarily focused in on flashes chronicled by amateur imagers and observers in recent years. In particular, researchers focused on impact events witnessed on March 17th 2016 and May 26th, 2017, along with the comparison of exogenous (of cosmic origin) dust measured in the upper atmosphere. This allowed researchers to come up with an interesting estimate: Jupiter most likely gets hit by an asteroid 5-20 meters in diameter (for comparison, the Chelyabinsk bolide was an estimated 20 meters across) 10 to 65 times every year, though researchers extrapolate that a dedicated search might only nab an impact flash or scar once every 0.4 to 2.4 years or so.
Full article here:
The paper online here:
Juno’s 12th perijove in lifelike color
Emily Lakdawalla • May 11, 2018
With the help of some preprocessing of JunoCam images by Mattias Malmer, Don Davis shows us how Jupiter might have looked on April 1, 2018, if we’d been aboard Juno.
Juno meets Cassini: A new merged global map of Jupiter
Björn Jónsson • May 14, 2018
The Juno spacecraft that is currently orbiting Jupiter has obtained the first good images of Jupiter’s polar regions. I am presenting here a combined global map of Jupiter, made from a Cassini map I made for the equatorial and temperate regions and polar maps made from the Juno JunoCam and JIRAM polar images.
News | June 6, 2018
NASA Re-plans Juno’s Jupiter Mission
NASA has approved an update to Juno’s science operations until July 2021. This provides for an additional 41 months in orbit around Jupiter and will enable Juno to achieve its primary science objectives. Juno is in 53-day orbits rather than 14-day orbits as initially planned because of a concern about valves on the spacecraft’s fuel system. This longer orbit means that it will take more time to collect the needed science data.
An independent panel of experts confirmed in April that Juno is on track to achieve its science objectives and is already returning spectacular results. The Juno spacecraft and all instruments are healthy and operating nominally.
NASA has now funded Juno through FY 2022. The end of prime operations is now expected in July 2021, with data analysis and mission close-out activities continuing into 2022.
News | June 6, 2018
Juno Solves 39-Year Old Mystery of Jupiter Lightning
Ever since NASA’s Voyager 1 spacecraft flew past Jupiter in March, 1979, scientists have wondered about the origin of Jupiter’s lightning. That encounter confirmed the existence of Jovian lightning, which had been theorized for centuries. But when the venerable explorer hurtled by, the data showed that the lightning-associated radio signals didn’t match the details of the radio signals produced by lightning here at Earth.
In a new paper published in Nature today, scientists from NASA’s Juno mission describe the ways in which lightning on Jupiter is actually analogous to Earth’s lightning. Although, in some ways, the two types of lightning are polar opposites.
“No matter what planet you’re on, lightning bolts act like radio transmitters — sending out radio waves when they flash across a sky,” said Shannon Brown of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, a Juno scientist and lead author of the paper. “But until Juno, all the lightning signals recorded by spacecraft [Voyagers 1 and 2, Galileo, Cassini] were limited to either visual detections or from the kilohertz range of the radio spectrum, despite a search for signals in the megahertz range. Many theories were offered up to explain it, but no one theory could ever get traction as the answer.”