≡ Menu

Europa: Night-time Glow a New Tool for Analysis

When it comes to Europa, it’s the surface that counts as we try to learn more about the ocean beneath. Maybe one day we’ll be able to get some kind of probe through the ice, but for now we have to think about things like upwellings of water that percolate up through cracks in the frozen landscape, and unusual areas like Europa’s ‘chaos’ terrain. Here, fractures and evident ‘rafts’ of ice show disruptions where the icy surface of the moon experiences Jupiter’s tidal effects.

Image: The surface of Jupiter’s moon Europa features a widely varied landscape, including ridges, bands, small rounded domes and disrupted spaces that geologists called “chaos terrain.” This newly reprocessed image, along with two others along the same longitude, was taken by NASA’s Galileo spacecraft on Sept. 26, 1998, and reveals details of diverse surface features on Europa. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SETI Institute.

What kind of materials might we find frozen into the cracks and grooves of such terrain? Europa Clipper will doubtless tell us more as it updates Galileo’s two-decade old data. Meanwhile, we recently learned about another way to study the moon’s surface composition. At the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Murthy Gudipati and team have been doing laboratory work that informs our understanding of how Europa reacts to the inflow of high-energy radiation from Jupiter. The high flux of charged particles occurs because of interactions with Jupiter’s magnetic field.

The key to the work is the fact that different salty compounds produce their own unique signature as they respond to this radiation bath. A glow emerges — sometimes green to the eye, sometimes edging into blue or white — depending on the materials in question. Gudipati’s team used a spectrometer, as we would expect, to study the surface, but here the observations are taking place not with reflected sunlight on the dayside but Europa’s own glow at night. The paper on this work, which appeared in Nature Astronomy, shows us how much data could be gathered by a method that seems to have surprised the scientists involved.

JPL co-author Bryana Henderson explains:

“[W]e never imagined that we would see what we ended up seeing. When we tried new ice compositions, the glow looked different. And we all just stared at it for a while and then said, ‘This is new, right? This is definitely a different glow?’ So we pointed a spectrometer at it, and each type of ice had a different spectrum.”

Image: This illustration of Jupiter’s moon Europa shows how the icy surface may glow on its nightside, the side facing away from the Sun. New lab experiments re-created the environment of Europa and find that the icy moon shines, even on its nightside, due to an ice glow. As Jupiter bombards Europa with radiation, the electrons penetrate the surface, energizing the molecules underneath. When those molecules relax, they release energy as visible light. Variations in the glow and the color of the glow itself could reveal information about the composition of ice on Europa’s surface. Different salty compounds react differently to the radiation and emit their own unique glimmer. Color will vary based on the real composition of Europa’s surface. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech.

The process seems straightforward, but sometimes it takes replicating known conditions as closely as possible in a lab to discover the consequences. Start with ice mixed with salts like magnesium sulfate and sodium chloride. Bathe the mix in radiation. The glow is a natural result, its variations linked to different compositions of the ice. Those variations are what gives this work implications for missions like Europa Clipper.

Sodium chloride brine, for example, turned out to produce a lower level of glow in the team’s setup, which used an instrument built at JPL known delightfully as ICE-HEART (Ice Chamber for Europa’s High-Energy Electron and Radiation Environment Testing). The experiments were run at a high-energy electron beam facility in Gaithersburg, Maryland once ICE-HEART had been taken there, the original plan being to study organic material under the Europan ice. The continuous glow on Europa’s night side now emerges as a source of future data, one that can be compared with these laboratory results to identify salty components on the surface.

“It’s not often that you’re in a lab and say, ‘We might find this when we get there,'” Gudipati said. “Usually it’s the other way around – you go there and find something and try to explain it in the lab. But our prediction goes back to a simple observation, and that’s what science is about.”

So Europa Clipper can use night-time flybys to delve into the chemical composition below, a method that may turn out to be helpful on other Galilean moons, or wherever high doses of ionizing radiation sleet down upon a frozen surface. Specific to Europa Clipper’s instruments, we learn the following:

Observation of night-time, high-energy, radiation-induced ice glow on the trailing hemisphere could thus provide more constraints on the chemical composition of non-ice material, revealing whether sulfates or chlorides are present, what their counterions could be, and whether pure water-ice patches are detectable. Dark regions could imply sodium- and chloride-dominant surfaces, whereas brighter regions could imply magnesium- and sulfate-dominant surfaces in the absence of water ice. The presence or absence of water ice could unambiguously be determined by the MISE [Mapping Imaging Spectrometer for Europa] instrument, designed to span a wavelength range of 0.8 μm to 5 μm, covering ice absorption features in the daytime.

In addition, the glow of night-time ice can be measured against daylight observations from Europa Clipper’s Wide Angle Camera and the MISE spectrometer to dig deeper into the chemical composition below. Some ultraviolet features of the night-time spectra will allow mission scientists to flag temperature anomalies on the surface for future observations.

The paper is Gudipati et al., “Laboratory predictions for the night-side surface ice glow of Europa,” Nature Astronomy 9 November 2020 (abstract).

tzf_img_post
{ 8 comments… add one }
  • Geoffrey Hillend November 11, 2020, 15:39

    Very interesting. The high speed electrons are accelerated in Jupiter’s powerful magnetic field. How faint is the glow in the visible light? The camera might have to be sensitive with a large lens with a spectrometer which uses the visible spectrum.

    Io has a lot of tidal heating. I wonder what an infra red camera might reveal.

  • Alex Tolley November 11, 2020, 16:30

    It is a pity that this technique only works in the unique high radiation environment of Jupiter’s inner moons, otherwise, we could apply it to other moons, and asteroids like Ceres.

    • Mike Serfas November 11, 2020, 22:28

      This is probably crazy, but is it conceivable to set up a powerful accelerator in Earth orbit, used to launch a very tight beam of particles to paint a dot on the distant target? Then an Earth-based telescope would record the overall brightness of part of the moon’s dark side without having to get very good resolution. The beam might be hard to control precisely, but over time a model of how it moved across the moon taking into account all magnetic fields might be assembled.

      An accelerator is a big thing to put in space … but space is big, and the bigger the accelerator the smaller the magnets can be. Plus, maybe it could just steal particles from the Van Allen belts?

      I suppose it is hard to herd electrons in a vacuum … maybe protons instead, to slow the rate they spread out? I suppose a “lens” could be rigged up like in an electron microscope where the beam is allowed to spread a bit, then the particles are pushed back toward the center so they don’t keep spreading all the way to whatever airless body you want to image.

  • P November 11, 2020, 18:09

    Interesting

    Now that we know, might there be faint evidence of this nighttime glow somewhere in the planetary dataset of flyby (and orbiter) images?

    P

  • Ashley Baldwin November 11, 2020, 20:43

    Rather stunningly we may not have the wait long to find out.

    The JUNO spacecraft has continued to function so well that the mission team have applied for a further extension when its current iteration ends next July – after 34 close encounters with Jupiter. Not just more Jupiter science either. The spacecraft orbit will be inclined to allow close observation encounters of Io ( x12) , Ganymede (x2) and Europa (x3) up to the end of 2025 (with another forty plus Jupiter encounters ) . The Europa encounters will occur early on between Sept 2021 and the end of 2022. The closest at just 200 miles . Juno has numerous instruments that could spot a glow including but not limited to JADE, JIRAM and JEDI. To say nothing of JunoCam. A nice stocking filling pathfinder till Clipper and JUICE arrive shortly after .

    If approved.

    The decision date is around the end of this year. Got to be one of the most left field and imaginative mission extension proposals in the history of mission extension proposals.

    Go Juno !

  • AlexTru November 12, 2020, 3:48

    Good prediction of possible effect observations, but I see here in comments some people accept this information as already observed effect – that is not the true meanwhile, none has observed that glow yet and there is chance that it is not exist in reality…

  • torque_xtr November 12, 2020, 16:42

    I realized it would be wonderful to see an X-ray fluorescence spectrometer aboard Europa Clipper. Electron irradiation excites this kind of analytic signal as well, and it is extremely informative about elemental composition. Europa and other inner Galileans, being placed in high electron flux, are unique objects in Solar system for such study. And it does not require much. An energy-dispersive detector, plus coded aperture and some shielding – it could all weigh under kilogram but be able to map every element heavier than carbon which is present in enough quantity in the top microns or millimeters of surface (depends on atomic number).

    I tried to crudely estimate XRF intensity. If the logic is right, than for 3e8 electrons per cm^2 and 1% of fluorescence yield averaged over these energies there will be some 3e6 x-ray fluorescence quanta per second from square centimeter near the surface. For a collimation angle of 5 degrees at a low altitude it translates to around thousand photons per second on a square centimeter detector. While not too much, the intensity is still considerable and it can be greatly improved by increasing collecting area, adding simple optics, etc., and the spot size for low altitude is rather small (but also exposure time).

    PS my inspiration on this is very straightforward. I had some experience with lab EDXRF (no electron beams but an X-ray tube), and once X-rayed a luminophor sample under increasing irradiation. Element lines show up in X-ray spectrum long before the visible fluorescence can be observed on long-exposure photos at night. Of course Europa is quite different setup… But it’s still likely if the visible fluorescence is expected to be seen, than X-ray lines will shine bright. And be much more specific about composition!

  • Michael November 13, 2020, 14:46

    Could it be enough for bacteria or life to use as the light should shine downwards as well.

Leave a Comment