Simulating Exoplanets, and the Payoff

by | Oct 11, 2006 | Exoplanetary Science, Research Tools | 3 comments

Just how representative are the 200+ planets we have now found around other stars? Consider that the most frequently used detection method involves radial velocity searches, looking for the tiny wobbles in a star’s motion that provide clues to the gravitational presence of a planet. It’s a solid technique that has found numerous ‘hot Jupiters,’ but the method introduces a bias for the kind of massive planets close to their star that create effects most visible from Earth.

And consider other factors: telescope time is sharply limited, and so are the swatches of sky most likely to be observed based on where the best telescopes are housed. We get more data on some exoplanetary systems, much less on others, and our view of what may be representative needs serious work.

Which is why the Systemic project was created, and why it is clearly gaining momentum. Regular Centauri Dreams readers know that Systemic is a simulation based on a dataset of 100,000 stars, one that can be accessed at the project’s Web site. What’s fascinating here is that whether you’re an astronomer or just an interested layman with a PC, you can play around with exoplanet properties like mass and vary the orbital parameters of hypothetical worlds to find a workable fit.

Make no mistake, these are simulated planet searches, but they perform a valuable function. Taking observational biases based on our methods into consideration, Systemic can get a better idea of how accurate our current search process is. “How good are we at detecting strange systems? Stars with three planets instead of two? Two instead of one? There are a lot of questions like this that can be addressed with a large-scale simulation,” said Greg Laughlin, who founded the project with a team of collaborators.

Consider this a renewed call for volunteers. You don’t need an expensive telescope to get involved, just an Internet connection and a desire to participate in a hunt that to my mind is one of the most exciting things going. Like SETI@home, which also uses the distributed power of legions of small computers around the world, Systemic relies on wide-scale involvement. The introductory phase it’s now in is a good time to learn to use the powerful software tools it offers.

3 Comments

  1. Any hope of a Mac capable version in the future? [ducks]

    P

  2. The downloadable console is already Mac-capable. From the site:

    “The newest version of the systemic console is now available for download. It has been successfully tested on multiple Mac, Windows, and Linux machines*. All major console updates will now be made to this downloadable version, instead of the online applet version, which seems to have problems loading on many Windows platforms. The installation instructions for each platform appear below.”

  3. D’owp! Excellent! I suppose I was being overly defensive :) Full credit to the designers, that really is an inspiring site.

    P

Now Reading

Charter

In Centauri Dreams, Paul Gilster looks at peer-reviewed research on deep space exploration, with an eye toward interstellar possibilities. For many years this site coordinated its efforts with the Tau Zero Foundation. It now serves as an independent forum for deep space news and ideas. In the logo above, the leftmost star is Alpha Centauri, a triple system closer than any other star, and a primary target for early interstellar probes. To its right is Beta Centauri (not a part of the Alpha Centauri system), with Beta, Gamma, Delta and Epsilon Crucis, stars in the Southern Cross, visible at the far right (image courtesy of Marco Lorenzi).

Recent Posts

On Comments

If you'd like to submit a comment for possible publication on Centauri Dreams, I will be glad to consider it. The primary criterion is that comments contribute meaningfully to the debate. Among other criteria for selection: Comments must be on topic, directly related to the post in question, must use appropriate language, and must not be abusive to others. Civility counts. In addition, a valid email address is required for a comment to be considered. Centauri Dreams is emphatically not a soapbox for political or religious views submitted by individuals or organizations. Human comments only, please -- cut and paste from AI will not be acceptable. A long form of the policy can be viewed on the Administrative page. The short form is this: If your comment is not on topic and respectful to others, I'm probably not going to run it.


Advanced Propulsion Research

Beginning and End

Archives